[openstack-dev] openstack/requirements failure

2015-02-11 Thread Manickam, Kanagaraj
Hi In horizon I am trying to increase the python-heatclient=0.3.0 as part of the review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/154952/ and its failed with following error: Requirement python-heatclient=0.3.0 does not match openstack/requirements value python-heatclient=0.2.9 More details at

Re: [openstack-dev] openstack/requirements failure

2015-02-11 Thread Ben Nemec
On 02/11/2015 11:33 AM, Manickam, Kanagaraj wrote: Hi In horizon I am trying to increase the python-heatclient=0.3.0 as part of the review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/154952/ and its failed with following error: Requirement python-heatclient=0.3.0 does not match

Re: [openstack-dev] openstack/requirements failure

2015-02-11 Thread Manickam, Kanagaraj
Thanks Ben Nemec. I have proposed the changes https://review.openstack.org/154989. -Original Message- From: Ben Nemec [mailto:openst...@nemebean.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 11:25 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] openstack/requirements and tarball subdirs

2014-07-14 Thread Philipp Marek
It might be better to work with the python-dbus authors to get a pip-installable package released to PyPI, so that it can be included in the tox virtualenv (though for DevStack we'd still want to use distro packages instead of PyPI, I think). I sent Simon an email about that now. I talked

Re: [openstack-dev] openstack/requirements and tarball subdirs

2014-07-14 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Philipp Marek philipp.ma...@linbit.com wrote: It might be better to work with the python-dbus authors to get a pip-installable package released to PyPI, so that it can be included in the tox virtualenv (though for DevStack we'd still want to use distro

Re: [openstack-dev] openstack/requirements and tarball subdirs

2014-07-09 Thread Philipp Marek
It might be better to work with the python-dbus authors to get a pip-installable package released to PyPI, so that it can be included in the tox virtualenv (though for DevStack we'd still want to use distro packages instead of PyPI, I think). I sent Simon an email about that now. -- : Ing.

Re: [openstack-dev] openstack/requirements and tarball subdirs

2014-07-08 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 1:46 AM, Philipp Marek philipp.ma...@linbit.com wrote: Hello Doug, thank you for your help. I guess the problem is that the subdirectory within that tarball includes the version number, as in dbus-python-0.84.0/. How can I tell the extract script that it should

Re: [openstack-dev] openstack/requirements and tarball subdirs

2014-07-08 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Philipp Marek philipp.ma...@linbit.com wrote: The other tarballs in that hierarchy follow the same schema; perhaps the cached download is broken? I downloaded the tarball and didn't find a setup.py at all. Oh, that is the requirement? I'd have guessed that

Re: [openstack-dev] openstack/requirements and tarball subdirs

2014-07-08 Thread Philipp Marek
The 1.2.0 release from http://dbus.freedesktop.org/releases/dbus-python/ doesn't look like an sdist, either (I see a configure script, so I think they've switched to autoconf). Uploading that version to PyPI isn't going to give you something you can install with pip. Are there system

Re: [openstack-dev] openstack/requirements and tarball subdirs

2014-07-08 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2014-07-08 09:09:35 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote: [...] You'll also need to modify cinder's tox.ini to set sitepackages = True so the virtualenvs created for the unit tests can see the global site-packages directory. Nova does the same thing for some of its dependencies. Nova did

Re: [openstack-dev] openstack/requirements and tarball subdirs

2014-07-08 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: On 2014-07-08 09:09:35 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote: [...] You'll also need to modify cinder's tox.ini to set sitepackages = True so the virtualenvs created for the unit tests can see the global site-packages

[openstack-dev] openstack/requirements and tarball subdirs

2014-07-07 Thread Philipp Marek
Hi everybody, I'm trying to get https://review.openstack.org/#/c/99013/ through Jenkins, but keep failing. The requirement I'm trying to add is dbus-python=0.83 # MIT License The logfile at

Re: [openstack-dev] openstack/requirements and tarball subdirs

2014-07-07 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 5:14 AM, Philipp Marek philipp.ma...@linbit.com wrote: Hi everybody, I'm trying to get https://review.openstack.org/#/c/99013/ through Jenkins, but keep failing. The requirement I'm trying to add is dbus-python=0.83 # MIT License The logfile at

Re: [openstack-dev] openstack/requirements and tarball subdirs

2014-07-07 Thread Philipp Marek
Hello Doug, thank you for your help. I guess the problem is that the subdirectory within that tarball includes the version number, as in dbus-python-0.84.0/. How can I tell the extract script that it should look into that one? It looks like that package wasn't built correctly as an

[openstack-dev] OpenStack Requirements

2013-08-02 Thread Yijing Zhang
Hello, I'd like you to do a OpenStack Requirements code review. The reason I send this request is another patch of mine is depends on whether this one patch get approved. Please visit https://review.openstack.org/#/c/38429/ Regards and best wishes, Yijing Zhang

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack Requirements

2013-08-02 Thread Noorul Islam K M
Yijing Zhang traceyzh...@siu.edu writes: Hello, I'd like you to do a OpenStack Requirements code review. The reason I send this request is another patch of mine is depends on whether this one patch get approved. Please visit https://review.openstack.org/#/c/38429/ I am new here. Is it

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack Requirements

2013-08-02 Thread Sean Dague
On 08/02/2013 05:18 AM, Noorul Islam K M wrote: Yijing Zhang traceyzh...@siu.edu writes: Hello, I'd like you to do a OpenStack Requirements code review. The reason I send this request is another patch of mine is depends on whether this one patch get approved. Please visit