Re: [openstack-dev] Operators & Design Summit ideas for Atlanta

Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Operators & Design Summit ideas for Atlanta So far, there's been no comment from anyone working on nova, so there's been no session proposed. I can, of course, propose a session ... but without buy-in from the project team it's unlikely to be

Re: [openstack-dev] Operators & Design Summit ideas for Atlanta

ifferently. The Telco services is something Openstack clearly need help in understanding. /Alan -Original Message- From: Steven Hardy [mailto:sha...@redhat.com] Sent: April-08-14 5:56 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Operator

Re: [openstack-dev] Operators & Design Summit ideas for Atlanta

It would be incredibly useful to get some of the "packagers" into this conversation too. Matt On 4/8/14 4:51 AM, "Steven Hardy" wrote: >On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 08:24:00AM -0500, Dolph Mathews wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Adam Young wrote: >> >> > On 03/28/2014 03:01 AM, Tom Fif

Re: [openstack-dev] Operators & Design Summit ideas for Atlanta

On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 03:01:30PM +0800, Tom Fifield wrote: > Thanks to those projects that responded. I've proposed sessions in > swift, ceilometer, tripleO and horizon. I just created a session for Heat: http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/247 Historically Heat sessions have been quite we

Re: [openstack-dev] Operators & Design Summit ideas for Atlanta

On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 08:24:00AM -0500, Dolph Mathews wrote: > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Adam Young wrote: > > > On 03/28/2014 03:01 AM, Tom Fifield wrote: > > > >> Thanks to those projects that responded. I've proposed sessions in swift, > >> ceilometer, tripleO and horizon. > >> > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] Operators & Design Summit ideas for Atlanta

Based on some off-list chatter with Michael, Tom and others, I went ahead and submitted a proposal for a nova session - http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/245 - and used Tom's wording from those submitted to other products. This will hold a place while the Nova PTL election finishes and we'll

Re: [openstack-dev] Operators & Design Summit ideas for Atlanta

If the timing works, that seems fine :) Regards, Tom On 07/04/14 10:32, Michael Still wrote: It might be that this is happening because there is no clear incumbent for the Nova PTL position. Is it ok to hold off on this until after the outcome of the election is known? Michael On Mon, Apr 7

Re: [openstack-dev] Operators & Design Summit ideas for Atlanta

It might be that this is happening because there is no clear incumbent for the Nova PTL position. Is it ok to hold off on this until after the outcome of the election is known? Michael On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Tom Fifield wrote: > So far, there's been no comment from anyone working on nov

Re: [openstack-dev] Operators & Design Summit ideas for Atlanta

So far, there's been no comment from anyone working on nova, so there's been no session proposed. I can, of course, propose a session ... but without buy-in from the project team it's unlikely to be accepted. Regards, Tom On 01/04/14 22:44, Matt Van Winkle wrote: So, I've been watching

Re: [openstack-dev] Operators & Design Summit ideas for Atlanta

On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Adam Young wrote: > On 03/28/2014 03:01 AM, Tom Fifield wrote: > >> Thanks to those projects that responded. I've proposed sessions in swift, >> ceilometer, tripleO and horizon. >> > > > Keystone would also be interested in user feedback, of course. Crossing op

Re: [openstack-dev] Operators & Design Summit ideas for Atlanta

So, I've been watching the etherpad and the summit submissions and I noticed that there isn't anything for nova. Maybe I'm off base, but it seems like we'd be missing the mark to not have a Developer/Operator's exchange on the key product. Is there anything we can do to get a session slotted like

Re: [openstack-dev] Operators & Design Summit ideas for Atlanta

On 03/28/2014 03:01 AM, Tom Fifield wrote: Thanks to those projects that responded. I've proposed sessions in swift, ceilometer, tripleO and horizon. Keystone would also be interested in user feedback, of course. On 17/03/14 07:54, Tom Fifield wrote: All, Many times we've heard a desire fo

Re: [openstack-dev] Operators & Design Summit ideas for Atlanta

Tom, This is a great idea! Feel free to reach out to the user experience folks, as they’ll be interested both in attending and helping coordinate. http://ask-openstackux.rhcloud.com/questions/ openstack-perso...@lists.openstack.org Best, Jacki On

Re: [openstack-dev] Operators & Design Summit ideas for Atlanta

Thanks to those projects that responded. I've proposed sessions in swift, ceilometer, tripleO and horizon. On 17/03/14 07:54, Tom Fifield wrote: All, Many times we've heard a desire for more feedback and interaction from users. However, their attendance at design summit sessions is met with va

[openstack-dev] Operators & Design Summit ideas for Atlanta

All, Many times we've heard a desire for more feedback and interaction from users. However, their attendance at design summit sessions is met with varied success. However, last summit, by happy accident, a swift session turned into a something a lot more user driven. A competent user was abl