Sean Dague s...@dague.net writes:
#1) do we believe OFTC is fundamentally better equipped to resist a
DDOS, or do we just believe they are a smaller target? The ongoing DDOS
on meetup.com the past 2 weeks is a good indicator that being a smaller
fish only helps for so long.
After speaking
James E. Blair [mailto:jebl...@openstack.org] wrote:
significant amount of time chasing bots. It's clear that Freenode is
better able to deal with attacks than OFTC would be. However, OFTC
doesn't have to deal with them because they aren't happening; and that's
worth considering.
Does anyone
The fact is though that Freenode has had significant service degradation
due to DDoS attacks for quite some time
Rather than jumping ship, is there anything we as a community can do to
help Freenode? This would obviously require a commitment of time/money,
but it could be worth it for something
On Tue, Mar 04 2014, James E. Blair wrote:
If there aren't objections to this plan, I think we can propose a motion
to the TC with a date and move forward with it fairly soon.
That plan LGTM, and +1 for OFTC. :)
--
Julien Danjou
/* Free Software hacker
http://julien.danjou.info */
James E. Blair wrote:
Freenode has been having a rough time lately due to a series of DDoS
attacks which have been increasingly disruptive to collaboration.
Fortunately there's an alternative.
OFTC URL:http://www.oftc.net/ is a robust and established alternative
to Freenode. It is a
On 04/03/14 11:01, Thierry Carrez wrote:
James E. Blair wrote:
Freenode has been having a rough time lately due to a series of DDoS
attacks which have been increasingly disruptive to collaboration.
Fortunately there's an alternative.
OFTC URL:http://www.oftc.net/ is a robust and established
Stephen Gran wrote:
On 04/03/14 11:01, Thierry Carrez wrote:
James E. Blair wrote:
Freenode has been having a rough time lately due to a series of DDoS
attacks which have been increasingly disruptive to collaboration.
Fortunately there's an alternative.
OFTC URL:http://www.oftc.net/ is a
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 11:12:13AM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
On 04/03/14 11:01, Thierry Carrez wrote:
James E. Blair wrote:
Freenode has been having a rough time lately due to a series of DDoS
attacks which have been increasingly disruptive to collaboration.
Fortunately there's an
++, OFTC looks nice.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 11:12:13AM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
On 04/03/14 11:01, Thierry Carrez wrote:
James E. Blair wrote:
Freenode has been having a rough time lately due to a series of DDoS
On 03/04/2014 06:13 PM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04 2014, James E. Blair wrote:
If there aren't objections to this plan, I think we can propose a motion
to the TC with a date and move forward with it fairly soon.
That plan LGTM, and +1 for OFTC. :)
Same over here, +1 for OFTC.
#1) do we believe OFTC is fundamentally better equipped to resist a
DDOS, or do we just believe they are a smaller target? The ongoing DDOS
on meetup.com the past 2 weeks is a good indicator that being a smaller
fish only helps for so long.
It seems like we would need a answer to this question.
On 03/04/2014 05:01 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
James E. Blair wrote:
Freenode has been having a rough time lately due to a series of DDoS
attacks which have been increasingly disruptive to collaboration.
Fortunately there's an alternative.
OFTC URL:http://www.oftc.net/ is a robust and
-1 to the switch from me.
this question from Sean is of fundamental value:
On 03/03/2014 03:19 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
#1) do we believe OFTC is fundamentally better equipped to resist a
DDOS, or do we just believe they are a smaller target? The ongoing DDOS
on meetup.com the past 2 weeks is a
I agree with Stefano. Migrating the entire community to a new service
would be incredibly painful. It seems the pain of moving is not justified
if we don’t know for a fact that OFTC would be more resilient to DDoS
attacks.
-1 to the switch as well.
-Doug Mendizabal
On 3/4/14, 2:48 PM,
From: Brian Cline br...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 03/04/2014 12:29 PM
Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] Proposal to move from Freenode to OFTC
On 03/04/2014 05:01 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
James E. Blair wrote:
Freenode has been having a rough
Hi,
Freenode has been having a rough time lately due to a series of DDoS
attacks which have been increasingly disruptive to collaboration.
Fortunately there's an alternative.
OFTC URL:http://www.oftc.net/ is a robust and established alternative
to Freenode. It is a smaller network whose mission
On 03/03/2014 06:07 PM, James E. Blair wrote:
Hi,
Freenode has been having a rough time lately due to a series of DDoS
attacks which have been increasingly disruptive to collaboration.
Fortunately there's an alternative.
OFTC URL:http://www.oftc.net/ is a robust and established
On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 15:07 -0800, James E. Blair wrote:
Hi,
Freenode has been having a rough time lately due to a series of DDoS
attacks which have been increasingly disruptive to collaboration.
Fortunately there's an alternative.
OFTC URL:http://www.oftc.net/ is a robust and established
Sean Dague s...@dague.net writes:
[I don't have anything substantial to add to q1 right now, though it's a
good one.]
#2) how bad do we believe nick contention might be in this transition?
We've got 1000+ people that have well known nicks on freenode, that
might hit conflicts on oftc.
Now
On 03/03/2014 06:07 PM, James E. Blair wrote:
If there aren't objections to this plan, I think we can propose a motion
to the TC with a date and move forward with it fairly soon.
Sounds good to me. The plan sounds well thought out and I trust your
judgement on the topic. :-)
Also, your
FYI
http://www.oftc.net/Services/#register-your-account
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 8:32 AM, James E. Blair jebl...@openstack.orgwrote:
Sean Dague s...@dague.net writes:
[I don't have anything substantial to add to q1 right now, though it's a
good one.]
#2) how bad do we believe nick
21 matches
Mail list logo
