On 01/30/2014 07:15 PM, John Dickinson wrote:
I've been keeping an eye on this thread, and it seems I actually have a few
minutes to spend on a response today.
To first answer the specific question, while there are some minor technical
concerns about oslo logging, the bigger concerns are
-Original Message-
From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
Sent: 31 January 2014 12:29
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Proposed Logging Standards
On 01/30/2014 07:15 PM, John Dickinson wrote:
1) Every log message
On 2014-01-31 07:00, Macdonald-Wallace, Matthew wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
Sent: 31 January 2014 12:29
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Proposed Logging Standards
On 01/30/2014 07:15 PM
-Original Message-
From: Ben Nemec [mailto:openst...@nemebean.com]
Sent: 31 January 2014 16:01
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Proposed Logging Standards
I'd just love to see the ability in the python logger to include the
application name
(not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Proposed Logging Standards
Hi Matthew,
I¹m interested to help in this switch to python logging framework for
shipping to
logstash/etc. Are you working on a blueprint for this?
Cheers,
Cristian
On 27/01/14 11:07, Macdonald-Wallace
.
Hope that helps,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Sanchez, Cristian A [mailto:cristian.a.sanc...@intel.com]
Sent: 29 January 2014 17:57
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Proposed Logging Standards
Hi Matthew,
I¹m interested
January 2014 13:08
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] Proposed Logging Standards
Back at the beginning of the cycle, I pushed for the idea of doing
some log harmonization, so that the OpenStack logs, across
services, made sense.
I've
pushed a proposed
, Cristian A [mailto:cristian.a.sanc...@intel.com]
Sent: 30 January 2014 13:44
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Proposed Logging Standards
Hi Matt,
What about the rest of the components? Do they also have this capability?
Thanks
On 01/27/2014 11:03 AM, Macdonald-Wallace, Matthew wrote:
I've also noticed just now that we appear to be re-inventing some parts of
the logging framework (openstack.common.log.WriteableLogger for example
appears to be a catchall when we should just be handing off to the default
logger and
On 01/28/2014 06:28 PM, Scott Devoid wrote:
A big part of my interest here is to make INFO a useful informational
level for operators. That means getting a bunch of messages out of it
that don't belong.
+1 to that! How should I open / tag bugs for this?
I'm thinking right
Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Proposed Logging Standards
Hi Matt,
What about the rest of the components? Do they also have this
capability?
Thanks
Cristian
On 30/01/14 04:59, Macdonald-Wallace, Matthew
matthew.macdonald-wall...@hp.com wrote:
Hi
Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] Proposed Logging Standards
Back at the beginning of the cycle, I pushed for the idea of doing
some log harmonization, so that the OpenStack logs, across
services, made sense.
I've
pushed a proposed changes to Nova and Keystone over the past
couple
On 01/28/2014 10:53 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
On Jan 27, 2014, at 6:57 PM, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com
mailto:cbky...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net
mailto:s...@dague.net wrote:
On 01/27/2014 09:07 AM, Macdonald-Wallace,
Sean Dague wrote:
Back at the beginning of the cycle, I pushed for the idea of doing some
log harmonization, so that the OpenStack logs, across services, made
sense. I've pushed a proposed changes to Nova and Keystone over the past
couple of days.
This is going to be a long process, so
On 01/27/2014 09:57 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net
mailto:s...@dague.net wrote:
On 01/27/2014 09:07 AM, Macdonald-Wallace, Matthew wrote:
Hi Sean,
I'm currently working on moving away from the built-in logging
Hi Sean,
it's great that you're catching this up.
I'd like to participate. I don't know how much time I'll be able to
dedicate on it, but at least I'm ready for reviews and pushing it to
Savanna.
Thanks!
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 01/27/2014 09:57
FYI it was added to the project meeting agenda -
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ProjectMeeting
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Sergey Lukjanov slukja...@mirantis.comwrote:
Hi Sean,
it's great that you're catching this up.
I'd like to participate. I don't know how much time I'll
Very interested, thanks a lot for this topic.
Will work on bringing all of this to Murano
--
Regards,
Alexander Tivelkov
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Sergey Lukjanov slukja...@mirantis.comwrote:
FYI it was added to the project meeting agenda -
I haven't started contributing to openstack, looks like this might be good
opportunity. Count me in. I had the same doubt about AUDIT level log in
cinder.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Alexander Tivelkov
ativel...@mirantis.comwrote:
Very interested, thanks a lot for this topic.
Will work
Hi Sean,
Could 1.1.1 Every Inbound WSGI request should be logged Exactly Once be used
to track API call data in order to discover which API calls are being made most
frequently?
It certainly seems like it could but I want to confirm. I ask because this came
up as B Get aggregate API call data
For the uses I've seen of it in the nova api code INFO would be perfectly
fine in place of AUDIT.
We've found the AUDIT logs in nova useful for tracking which user initiated
a particular request (e.g. delete this instance). AUDIT had a much better
signal to noise ratio than INFO or DEBUG.
On 01/28/2014 12:41 PM, Scott Devoid wrote:
For the uses I've seen of it in the nova api code INFO would be
perfectly fine in place of AUDIT.
We've found the AUDIT logs in nova useful for tracking which user
initiated a particular request (e.g. delete this instance). AUDIT had a
)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 01/28/2014 12:47 PM
Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] Proposed Logging Standards
For the uses I've seen of it in the nova api code INFO would be perfectly
fine in place of AUDIT.
We've found the AUDIT logs in nova useful for tracking which user
initiated
On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 16:25 -0500, Brad Topol wrote:
So we are starting to add more cloud audit (aka CADF) support to
OpenStack. We have support in Nova and infrastructure added to
Ceilometer and I am starting to add this capability to keystone. This
work is based on sending events to
On 01/28/2014 05:56 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 16:25 -0500, Brad Topol wrote:
So we are starting to add more cloud audit (aka CADF) support to
OpenStack. We have support in Nova and infrastructure added to
Ceilometer and I am starting to add this capability to keystone. This
A big part of my interest here is to make INFO a useful informational
level for operators. That means getting a bunch of messages out of it
that don't belong.
+1 to that! How should I open / tag bugs for this?
We should be logging user / tenant on every wsgi request, so that should
be
On Jan 27, 2014, at 6:57 PM, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 01/27/2014 09:07 AM, Macdonald-Wallace, Matthew wrote:
Hi Sean,
I'm currently working on moving away from the built-in logging to use
Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] Proposed Logging Standards
Back at the beginning of the cycle, I pushed for the idea of doing some log
harmonization, so that the OpenStack logs, across services, made sense. I've
pushed a proposed changes to Nova and Keystone over the past couple
I've also noticed just now that we appear to be re-inventing some parts of
the logging framework (openstack.common.log.WriteableLogger for example
appears to be a catchall when we should just be handing off to the default
logger and letting the python logging framework decide what to do
On 01/27/2014 09:07 AM, Macdonald-Wallace, Matthew wrote:
Hi Sean,
I'm currently working on moving away from the built-in logging to use
log_config=filename and the python logging framework so that we can start
shipping to logstash/sentry/insert other useful tool here.
I'd be very
-Original Message-
From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
Sent: 27 January 2014 14:26
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Proposed Logging Standards
On 01/27/2014 09:07 AM, Macdonald-Wallace, Matthew wrote:
Hi Sean
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
Back at the beginning of the cycle, I pushed for the idea of doing some
log harmonization, so that the OpenStack logs, across services, made
sense. I've pushed a proposed changes to Nova and Keystone over the past
couple of
On 01/27/2014 09:44 AM, Macdonald-Wallace, Matthew wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
Sent: 27 January 2014 14:26
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Proposed Logging Standards
On 01/27/2014 09
What I'd like to find out now:
1) who's interested in this topic?
Please include me.
2) who's interested in helping flesh out the guidelines for various log
levels?
Please include me.
3) who's interested in helping get these kinds of patches into various
projects in OpenStack?
4) which
On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 08:07 -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
Back at the beginning of the cycle, I pushed for the idea of doing some
log harmonization, so that the OpenStack logs, across services, made
sense. I've pushed a proposed changes to Nova and Keystone over the past
couple of days.
This is
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 6:07 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
Back at the beginning of the cycle, I pushed for the idea of doing some
log harmonization, so that the OpenStack logs, across services, made
sense. I've pushed a proposed changes to Nova and Keystone over the past
couple of
john.griff...@solidfire.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 01/27/2014 02:52 PM
Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] Proposed Logging Standards
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 6:07 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
Back
37 matches
Mail list logo
