On 10/31/2013 10:36 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
As has been said many times already, OpenStack does not lack
developers... it lacks reviewers.
In regards to reviews in general and in particular for welcoming new
committers I think we need to be careful about reviewers NAK'ing a
submission for
Good points from John.
The only concern for first time reviewers is that their comments gets
overseen by the committer. If the review comment is good, I feel
core-reviewer must put some weight on it and thus encourage genuine
suggestions.
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 9:33 AM, John Dennis
Indeed :) Can you share with us briefly what you found interesting in
the sessions of Upstream University? Which ones did you go to?
Upsteam University acted like a starter to me. I attended the september session
in Paris.
I'm interested in OpenStack since Essex but I did not dare submit my
On 10/31/2013 10:36 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2013-10-31 22:45:56 + (+), Romain Hardouin wrote:
Adding a message for new comers is a good idea.
I am a new Horizon contributor, some of my fixes have been merged
(thanks to Upstream University :-) and reviewers of course) but I
still
Hi all, br/br/Adding a message for new comers is a good idea. br/I am a
new Horizon contributor, some of my fixes have been merged (thanks to Upstream
University :-) and reviewers of course) but I still hesitate to do code review.
To my mind, it is reserved to known developpers whose opinion
On 10/31/2013 03:45 PM, Romain Hardouin wrote:
Adding a message for new comers is a good idea.
I am a new Horizon contributor, some of my fixes have been merged
(thanks to Upstream University :-)
Indeed :) Can you share with us briefly what you found interesting in
the sessions of Upstream
On 2013-10-31 22:45:56 + (+), Romain Hardouin wrote:
Adding a message for new comers is a good idea.
I am a new Horizon contributor, some of my fixes have been merged
(thanks to Upstream University :-) and reviewers of course) but I
still hesitate to do code review. To my mind, it is