On 09/07/15 at 09:27am, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
Hi Andrew,
2015-09-04 23:45 GMT+09:00 Andrew Laski :
Now we are discussing this on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/217727/
for allowing out-of-tree scheduler-hints.
When we wrote API schema for scheduler-hints, it was
> 在 2015年9月7日,上午8:27,Ken'ichi Ohmichi 写道:
>
> f we allow customization of scheduler-hints like new filters,
> out-of-tree filters without microversions, API users cannot know
> available scheduler-hints parameter from microversions number.
> That will be helpful for API
Hi Sylvain,
2015-09-04 19:56 GMT+09:00 Sylvain Bauza :
>
>
> Le 04/09/2015 12:18, Ken'ichi Ohmichi a écrit :
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> Thanks for your comment.
> IMO, this idea is different from the extension we will remove.
> That is modularity for the maintenance burden.
> By this
Hi Andrew,
2015-09-04 23:45 GMT+09:00 Andrew Laski :
>>>
>>> Now we are discussing this on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/217727/
>>> for allowing out-of-tree scheduler-hints.
>>> When we wrote API schema for scheduler-hints, it was difficult to know
>>> what are available
2015-09-04 12:14 GMT+09:00 Ken'ichi Ohmichi :
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Sorry for this late response, I missed it.
>
> 2015-06-25 23:22 GMT+09:00 Andrew Laski :
>> I have been growing concerned recently with some attempts to formalize
>> scheduler hints, both with
Hi Alex,
Thanks for your comment.
IMO, this idea is different from the extension we will remove.
That is modularity for the maintenance burden.
By this idea, we can put the corresponding schema in each filter.
2015年9月4日(金) 19:04 Alex Xu :
> 2015-09-04 11:14 GMT+08:00 Ken'ichi
2015-09-04 11:14 GMT+08:00 Ken'ichi Ohmichi :
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Sorry for this late response, I missed it.
>
> 2015-06-25 23:22 GMT+09:00 Andrew Laski :
> > I have been growing concerned recently with some attempts to formalize
> > scheduler hints, both
Le 04/09/2015 12:18, Ken'ichi Ohmichi a écrit :
Hi Alex,
Thanks for your comment.
IMO, this idea is different from the extension we will remove.
That is modularity for the maintenance burden.
By this idea, we can put the corresponding schema in each filter.
While I think it could be a
On 09/04/15 at 06:54pm, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
2015-09-04 12:14 GMT+09:00 Ken'ichi Ohmichi :
Hi Andrew,
Sorry for this late response, I missed it.
2015-06-25 23:22 GMT+09:00 Andrew Laski :
I have been growing concerned recently with some attempts to
Le 04/09/2015 14:57, Nikola Đipanov a écrit :
On 06/25/2015 04:50 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
On 06/25/2015 10:22 AM, Andrew Laski wrote:
I have been growing concerned recently with some attempts to formalize
scheduler hints, both with API validation and Nova objects defining
them, and want to
On 09/04/15 at 01:57pm, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
On 06/25/2015 04:50 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
On 06/25/2015 10:22 AM, Andrew Laski wrote:
I have been growing concerned recently with some attempts to formalize
scheduler hints, both with API validation and Nova objects defining
them, and want to air
On 09/04/2015 02:31 PM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
>
>
> Le 04/09/2015 14:57, Nikola Đipanov a écrit :
>> On 06/25/2015 04:50 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
>>> On 06/25/2015 10:22 AM, Andrew Laski wrote:
I have been growing concerned recently with some attempts to formalize
scheduler hints, both
On 06/25/2015 04:50 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> On 06/25/2015 10:22 AM, Andrew Laski wrote:
>> I have been growing concerned recently with some attempts to formalize
>> scheduler hints, both with API validation and Nova objects defining
>> them, and want to air those concerns and see if others agree
Hi Andrew,
Sorry for this late response, I missed it.
2015-06-25 23:22 GMT+09:00 Andrew Laski :
> I have been growing concerned recently with some attempts to formalize
> scheduler hints, both with API validation and Nova objects defining them,
> and want to air those concerns
I have been growing concerned recently with some attempts to formalize
scheduler hints, both with API validation and Nova objects defining
them, and want to air those concerns and see if others agree or can help
me see why I shouldn't worry.
Starting with the API I think the strict input
On 06/25/2015 10:22 AM, Andrew Laski wrote:
I have been growing concerned recently with some attempts to formalize
scheduler hints, both with API validation and Nova objects defining
them, and want to air those concerns and see if others agree or can help
me see why I shouldn't worry.
16 matches
Mail list logo