On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:00 AM, Henry Nash hen...@linux.vnet.ibm.comwrote:
Hi Adam,
Wanted to just give you more detail on the issue I keep pressing on for
your change (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/36731/).
For extensions which create their own private tables, I totally get it.
I'd
On 08/01/2013 11:40 AM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:00 AM, Henry Nash hen...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
mailto:hen...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Hi Adam,
Wanted to just give you more detail on the issue I keep pressing
on for your change
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/01/2013 11:40 AM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:00 AM, Henry Nash hen...@linux.vnet.ibm.comwrote:
Hi Adam,
Wanted to just give you more detail on the issue I keep pressing on for
your change
Hi Adam,
Wanted to just give you more detail on the issue I keep pressing on for your
change (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/36731/).
For extensions which create their own private tables, I totally get it. I'd
like, however, to understand what happens for a more complex extension. Let's
On 07/31/2013 06:00 AM, Henry Nash wrote:
Hi Adam,
Wanted to just give you more detail on the issue I keep pressing on for your
change (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/36731/).
For extensions which create their own private tables, I totally get it. I'd
like, however, to understand what
