Hi ya'll!
Comments inline:
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Brandon Logan brandon.lo...@rackspace.com
wrote:
Hi Eugene and Sam,
On Sun, 2014-06-01 at 12:07 +0400, Eugene Nikanorov wrote:
Hi Sam,
Eugene, please comment on the migration process bellow.
I think that
Hi Brandon Eugene and Everyone,
Eugene, please comment on the migration process bellow.
I think that closing down the status handling should be done in phase 1.
Missing to do so, will create tests and other depending workflows that assume
the current status field, which will add a technology
Hi Sam,
Eugene, please comment on the migration process bellow.
I think that closing down the status handling should be done in phase 1.
I don't mind. If you're talking about provisioning status then such status
(if we're still going to maintain it per each kind of object) goes to
various
Hi Eugene and Sam,
On Sun, 2014-06-01 at 12:07 +0400, Eugene Nikanorov wrote:
Hi Sam,
Eugene, please comment on the migration process bellow.
I think that closing down the status handling should be done
in phase 1.
I don't mind. If you're talking about
