uawei.com;
Luis Tomas Bolivar ; maruti.ka...@radisys.com;
Lajos Katona ; Dayavanti Gopal Kamath
; George Offord
*Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] l2gw
I've been taking a look at the implementation and thinking about which
cases update should be allowed.
At a first glance, I would say that we
I've been taking a look at the implementation and thinking about which
cases update should be allowed.
At a first glance, I would say that we should allow updates:
- Add a new interface (neutron l2-gateway-update gw1 --device
name=hwvtep,interface_names=eth0,*eth1*) being eth1 the new inte
Hi Ricardo,
That is the exception which gives us the trouble.
If you have ideas as you mentioned in which case a gw should be updated,
and in what not, that would be really nice.
Actually now we have a kind of development environment with devstack and
vtep emulator (http://docs.openvswitch.org
I see the exception now Lajos:
class L2GatewayInUse(exceptions.InUse):
message = _("L2 Gateway '%(gateway_id)s' still has active mappings "
"with one or more neutron networks.")
:-)
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 6:40 PM, Ricardo Noriega De Soto <
rnori...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hey
Hey Lajos,
Is this the exception you are encountering?
(neutron) l2-gateway-update --device name=hwvtep,interface_names=eth0,eth1
gw1
L2 Gateway 'b8ef7f98-e901-4ef5-b159-df53364ca996' still has active mappings
with one or more neutron networks.
Neutron server returns request_ids:
['req-f231dc53-c
Hi,
We faced an issue with l2-gw-update, which means that actually if there
are connections for a gw the update will throw an exception
(L2GatewayInUse), and the update is only possible after deleting first
the connections, do the update and add the connections back.
It is not exactly clear
> The ucast-mac-remote table is filled with information that don't match
> your comments. In my environment, I have created only one neutron
> network, one l2gw instance and one l2gw connection. However, the mac
> reflected in that table corresponds to the dhcp port of the Neutron
> network (I've c
Please L2GWers, review the following patch:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/480641/
It seems we can benefit from TripleO coverage to have L2GW service plugin
deployed in production-like deployments.
Cheers
--
Ricardo Noriega
Senior Software Engineer - NFV Partner Engineer | Office of Techno
Hello L2GWers!
Following the community goal for Queens to split in-tree tempest plugins to
a separate repo, I will perform this task in the following days. So please,
if anyone has got any concern, reply this email.
Cheers
--
Ricardo Noriega
Senior Software Engineer - NFV Partner Engineer | Of
Hi Saverio,
Comments and questions inline:
First of all, which backend are you using? the l2gateway agent? or
something like OpenDaylight?? I'm currently testing an L2GW scenario with
ODL.
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Saverio Proto
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a question about the l2gw. I d
Hello,
I try again. Any l2gw plugin user that wants to comment on my email ?
thank you
Saverio
On 29/05/17 16:54, Saverio Proto wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a question about the l2gw. I did a deployment, I described the
> steps here:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/453209/
>
> The unicast t
Hello,
I have a question about the l2gw. I did a deployment, I described the
steps here:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/453209/
The unicast traffic works fine, but I dont understand what is the idea
behind the handling of the broadcast traffic.
Looking at openvswitch:
I obtain the uuid with `
12 matches
Mail list logo
