On 12/19/2013 04:28 AM, John Dickinson wrote:
> Another option would be to use what we already have to our benefit. Instead
> of trying to provision two meeting rooms (-meeting and -meeting-alt), use the
> various other IRC channels that we already have for team meetings. This would
> allow for
Robert Collins wrote:
> So, I'm a little worried about the complexities of organising free
> slots given we're basically about to double the # of entrieshave in
> all our calendars.
I don't think that's what we are about to do, as I don't expect every
single meeting to implement a rotation. As I s
On 19/12/13 01:28 -0800, John Dickinson wrote:
Another option would be to use what we already have to our benefit. Instead of
trying to provision two meeting rooms (-meeting and -meeting-alt), use the
various other IRC channels that we already have for team meetings. This would
allow for meeti
Another option would be to use what we already have to our benefit. Instead of
trying to provision two meeting rooms (-meeting and -meeting-alt), use the
various other IRC channels that we already have for team meetings. This would
allow for meetings to be at the same time, but it would free up
So, I'm a little worried about the complexities of organising free
slots given we're basically about to double the # of entrieshave in
all our calendars.
Maybe we can do something a little simpler: just have the *whole
calender* shift phase 180' each week: it won't be perfect,
particularly for tho
