On 01/29/2014 07:27 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
> On 30 January 2014 10:29, Sean Dague wrote:
>
>
>>> would (worker-N) be sufficient? Or do you want *'s/x's specifically?
>>
>> So if we had worker-N we could play with a filter above that layer to do
>> UI formatting.
>>
>> Realistically I had a st
On 30 January 2014 10:29, Sean Dague wrote:
>> would (worker-N) be sufficient? Or do you want *'s/x's specifically?
>
> So if we had worker-N we could play with a filter above that layer to do
> UI formatting.
>
> Realistically I had a stream with enough metadata, and preferably a
> solid parsin
On 01/29/2014 04:19 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
> On 26 January 2014 02:25, Sean Dague wrote:
>> Something that's currently just far to manual to figure out is how testr
>> is functioning in the parallel case, which tests are running on which
>> process, and when does one of the pipelines run out of
On 26 January 2014 02:25, Sean Dague wrote:
> Something that's currently just far to manual to figure out is how testr
> is functioning in the parallel case, which tests are running on which
> process, and when does one of the pipelines run out of tests. The testr
> assumption that you don't want
Something that's currently just far to manual to figure out is how testr
is functioning in the parallel case, which tests are running on which
process, and when does one of the pipelines run out of tests. The testr
assumption that you don't want output unless there is a failure is a
really bad assu
