Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-12 Thread Thierry Carrez
Matt Riedemann wrote: Just an update: Kilo: I think we are OK here now, at least for some projects like nova - raising the minimum required neutronclient to =2.4.0 seems to have fixed things. Juno: We're still blocked on the large ops job:

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-12 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/12/2015 4:42 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Matt Riedemann wrote: Just an update: Kilo: I think we are OK here now, at least for some projects like nova - raising the minimum required neutronclient to =2.4.0 seems to have fixed things. Juno: We're still blocked on the large ops job:

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-11 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/10/2015 10:50 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/10/2015 9:40 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/9/2015 7:16 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/9/2015 7:09 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 8 August 2015 at 08:52, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: Well it's a Friday afternoon so

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-10 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/10/2015 9:40 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/9/2015 7:16 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/9/2015 7:09 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 8 August 2015 at 08:52, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: Well it's a Friday afternoon so you know what that means, emails about the stable

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-10 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/9/2015 7:16 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/9/2015 7:09 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 8 August 2015 at 08:52, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: Well it's a Friday afternoon so you know what that means, emails about the stable branches being all busted to pieces in the

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-10 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 8:28 PM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On 8/9/2015 7:55 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/9/2015 7:09 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/9/2015 6:57 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 8 August 2015 at 12:45, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-09 Thread Robert Collins
On 8 August 2015 at 12:45, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: What I do know is we need to be better about bumping the minor version in a release rather than the patch version all of the time - we've kind of painted ourselves into a corner a few times here with leaving no wiggle

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-09 Thread Robert Collins
On 8 August 2015 at 08:52, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: Well it's a Friday afternoon so you know what that means, emails about the stable branches being all busted to pieces in the gate. Tracking in the usual place: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stable-tracker Since

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-09 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/9/2015 7:55 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/9/2015 7:09 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/9/2015 6:57 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 8 August 2015 at 12:45, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: What I do know is we need to be better about bumping the minor version in a

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-09 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/9/2015 7:09 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 8 August 2015 at 08:52, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: Well it's a Friday afternoon so you know what that means, emails about the stable branches being all busted to pieces in the gate. Tracking in the usual place:

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-09 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/9/2015 7:09 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/9/2015 6:57 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 8 August 2015 at 12:45, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: What I do know is we need to be better about bumping the minor version in a release rather than the patch version all of the

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-09 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/9/2015 6:57 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 8 August 2015 at 12:45, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: What I do know is we need to be better about bumping the minor version in a release rather than the patch version all of the time - we've kind of painted ourselves into a

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-07 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On 8/7/2015 3:52 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: Well it's a Friday afternoon so you know what that means, emails about the stable branches being all busted to pieces in the gate. Tracking in the usual place:

[openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-07 Thread Matt Riedemann
Well it's a Friday afternoon so you know what that means, emails about the stable branches being all busted to pieces in the gate. Tracking in the usual place: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stable-tracker Since things are especially fun the last two days I figured it was time for a

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-07 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/7/2015 3:52 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: Well it's a Friday afternoon so you know what that means, emails about the stable branches being all busted to pieces in the gate. Tracking in the usual place: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stable-tracker Since things are especially fun the last

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-07 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/7/2015 5:27 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote: On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On 8/7/2015 3:52 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: Well it's a Friday afternoon so you know what that means, emails about

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-07 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/7/2015 7:41 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/7/2015 5:27 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote: On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On 8/7/2015 3:52 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: Well it's a Friday afternoon so