On 14 March 2014 03:07, sxmatch wrote:
> So, if we delete volume really, just keep snapshot alive, is it possible?
> User don't want to use this volume at now, he can take a snapshot and then
> delete volume.
>
> If he want it again, can create volume from this snapshot.
>
> Any ideas?
This has
于 2014-03-14 11:59, Zhangleiqiang (Trump) 写道:
From: sxmatch [mailto:sxmatch1...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 11:08 AM
To: Zhangleiqiang (Trump)
Cc: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete
protection
于 2014-03-11 19
之前百度的张磊强师兄？？
你现在在华为搞open stack？
---
韦远科
010 5881 3749
中国科学院 计算机网络信息中心
云计算平台：eccp.csdb.cn
On 2014年3月6日, at 下午2:19, Zhangleiqiang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Current openstack provide the delete volume function to the user.
> But it seems there is no any protection for use
> From: sxmatch [mailto:sxmatch1...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 11:08 AM
> To: Zhangleiqiang (Trump)
> Cc: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete
> protection
>
>
> 于 2014-03-11 19:24,
于 2014-03-11 19:24, Zhangleiqiang 写道:
From: Huang Zhiteng [mailto:winsto...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 5:37 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete
protection
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014
On 11 March 2014 09:09, Zhangleiqiang wrote:
> For example, one tenant's volume quota is five, and has 5 volumes and 1
> snapshot already. If the data in base volume of the snapshot is corrupted,
> the user will need to create a new volume from the snapshot, but this
> operation will be failed
> From: Huang Zhiteng [mailto:winsto...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 5:37 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete
> protection
>
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 5
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Zhangleiqiang wrote:
>> From: Huang Zhiteng [mailto:winsto...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 4:29 PM
>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Fea
> From: Huang Zhiteng [mailto:winsto...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 4:29 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete
> protection
>
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11
? Welcome any advices.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------
> >
> > zhangleiqiang
> >
> >
> >
> > Best Regards
> >
> >
> >
> > From: John Griffith [mailto:john.griff...@solidfire.com]
&
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> zhangleiqiang
>
>
>
> Best Regards
>
>
>
> From: John Griffith [mailto:john.griff...@solidfire.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 8:38 PM
>
>
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
&g
List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete
protection
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:13 PM, John Garbutt
mailto:j...@johngarbutt.com>> wrote:
On 6 March 2014 08:50, zhangyu (AI)
mailto:zhangy...@huawei.com>> wrote:
> It seems to b
District,
Beijing 100193, PRC
From: "zhangyu (AI)"
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
,
Date: 03/07/2014 09:09 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume
delete protection
it. Many thanks!
Leiqiang, you can take action now :)
From: John Griffith
[mailto:john.griff...@solidfire.com<mailto:john.griff...@solidfire.com>]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 8:38 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cin
for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete
protection
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:13 PM, John Garbutt
mailto:j...@johngarbutt.com>> wrote:
On 6 March 2014 08:50, zhangyu (AI)
mailto:zhangy...@huawei.com>> wrote:
> It seems to be
[Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete
protection
On 6 March 2014 08:50, zhangyu (AI) wrote:
> It seems to be an interesting idea. In fact, a China-based public
> IaaS, QingCloud, has provided a similar feature to their virtual
> servers. Within 2 hours after a virtual server i
e action now J
>
>
>
> *From:* John Griffith [mailto:john.griff...@solidfire.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 06, 2014 8:38 PM
>
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete
Got it. Many thanks!
Leiqiang, you can take action now :)
From: John Griffith [mailto:john.griff...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 8:38 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:13 PM, John Garbutt wrote:
> On 6 March 2014 08:50, zhangyu (AI) wrote:
> > It seems to be an interesting idea. In fact, a China-based public IaaS,
> QingCloud, has provided a similar feature
> > to their virtual servers. Within 2 hours after a virtual server is
> delete
On 6 March 2014 08:50, zhangyu (AI) wrote:
> It seems to be an interesting idea. In fact, a China-based public IaaS,
> QingCloud, has provided a similar feature
> to their virtual servers. Within 2 hours after a virtual server is deleted,
> the server owner can decide whether
> or not to cancel
It seems to be an interesting idea. In fact, a China-based public IaaS,
QingCloud, has provided a similar feature
to their virtual servers. Within 2 hours after a virtual server is deleted, the
server owner can decide whether
or not to cancel this deletion and re-cycle that "deleted" virtual serv
21 matches
Mail list logo
