Neutrinos,
For those of you who are going to attend the Neutron mid-cycle [1] in
person or be engaged on IRC, please refer to [2] for a list of topics we
should give some attention and priority during our time in Cork.
The list of topics is already pretty packed, however if you would like to
incl
Hi,
I am not a core reviewer but having met Dawid in person and working closely
with him on some important bug fixes – I fully support the idea.
From: Anastasia Kuznetsova
mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
mailto:openstac
On 07/30/2016 03:20 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
> [...]
> As I recall we no longer "move" the git repositories. We simply remove
> the permissions/ACLs so new reviews aren't added/approved, and often the
> repo is emptied with only a readme pointing to the new location.
Full documentation for the s
Hey folks,
I just wanted to let the core team and others in the community know this tag
application was rejected. The Kolla core team made a choice when we decided to
make Liberty non-dangerous. We knew at the time it would imperil an
application for stable:follows-policy. We thought at the
On 27 July 2016 at 19:10, Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 04:09:54PM +0200, Markus Zoeller wrote:
> > Since yesterday, Nova uses "oslo.context" 2.6.0 [1] but the needed
> > change [2] is not yet in place, which broke "gate-nova-python27-db"[3].
> > Logstash counts 70 hits/h [4]. Most
Hi,
You posted a project for "Google summer of code 2016" named: "Neutron -
Metering agent add port statistics".
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Internship_ideas
The project is listed as 'Open' on the wiki and i could’t find a "open project"
regarding this on the GSOC website or project:opensta
Right this is step #1 there, although slightly different because this
project isn't really retired, its just moved to a different place; but
good enough :-P
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
On 07/30/2016 03:20 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
[...]
As I recall we no longer "move" the git repositories. We simp
Jamie,
I’ve updated your review re: u-c oslo.context==2.7.0 in Trove. It will fail but
that is understood. I’ve manually tested o.c 2.7.0 and it appears to work.
-amrith
From: Jamie Lennox [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2016 2:17 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing Lis
Doug,
Thanks for doing this. In the interests of transparency and full disclosure, I
was at the leadership training and heard about this idea there (and was
strongly in favor of it then, as I am now).
I think it is very important that OpenStack not devolve into a loose
confederation of bags of
+1, good job, Dawid!
Regards!
---
Lingxian Kong
On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 10:59 PM, Elisha, Moshe (Nokia - IL)
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am not a core reviewer but having met Dawid in person and working closely
> with him on some important bug fixes – I fully support the
Yes, this was intentionally done.The logical-source-port is important only at
the point of classification.All successive classifications rely only on the 5
tuple and MPLS label (chain ID).
Consider an extension of the scenario you mention below.
Sources: (similar to your case)a b
Port-pairs: (add
for a second I thought that would be a great life cycle operation for
bays .. :)
Ton,
From: Adrian Otto
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Date: 07/29/2016 11:31 AM
Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [container] [docker] [magnum] [z
Hi Akshay,
For 80 to 443 redirection, you can accomplish this using the new L7
rules capability. You would setup a listener on port 80 that has a
redirect rule to the 443 URL.
On the barbican question, if you are using the octavia driver, you
will need to set the required settings in the octavia
13 matches
Mail list logo
