[openstack-dev] [openstack-infra] How to take over a project?

Dear OpenStack Infra team, I would like to know how to take over an OpenStack project. I am a committer of the networking-onos project (https://github.com/openstack/networking-onos ), and I would like to take over the project. The current

Re: [openstack-dev] [Mistral]I think Mistral need K8S action

Thank you very much for your help. I'm doing some tests now and I'll let you know if I start the K8S action. Thanks again, Xian Jun Hong From: Dougal Matthews Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2018 6:00 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] z/VM introducing a new config driveformat

On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 14:56:06 +0800, Chen Ch Ji wrote: >>>The "iso file" will not be inside the guest, but rather passed to the guest as a block device, right? Cloud init expects to find a config drive with following requirements [1], in order to make cloud init able to consume config drive ,

Re: [openstack-dev] [rally][dragonflow][ec2-api][PowerVMStackers][murano] Tagging rights

Hi Sean! yaql is OK to this. On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 3:46 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > Hello teams, > > I am following up on some recently announced changes regarding governed > projects and tagging rights. See [1] for background. > > It was mostly followed before that

Re: [openstack-dev] Removing networking-mlnx from Debian?

> -Original Message- > From: Jeremy Stanley [mailto:fu...@yuggoth.org] > Sent: Monday, April 16, 2018 10:44 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Removing networking-mlnx from Debian? >

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] Adding a SDK to developer.openstack.org pages

On 06/04/18 22:37, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2018-04-06 12:00:24 +1000 (+1000), Gilles Dubreuil wrote: I'd like to update the developer.openstack.org to add details about a new SDK. What would be the corresponding repo? My searches landed me into https://docs.openstack.org/doc-contrib-guide/

Re: [openstack-dev] [placement] Anchor/Relay Providers

On 04/16/2018 06:23 PM, Eric Fried wrote: I still don't see a use in returning the root providers in the allocation requests -- since there is nothing consuming resources from those providers. And we already return the root_provider_uuid for all providers involved in allocation requests within

Re: [openstack-dev] [placement] Anchor/Relay Providers

> I still don't see a use in returning the root providers in the > allocation requests -- since there is nothing consuming resources from > those providers. > > And we already return the root_provider_uuid for all providers involved > in allocation requests within the provider_summaries section.

Re: [openstack-dev] [PBR] Patches on PBR

Hello, I have started a few other patches on PBR, can anyone give me some feedback on them? https://review.openstack.org/558181 https://review.openstack.org/561731 https://review.openstack.org/559484 They don't do that much, but they can help dev workflow Thanks a lot ! - Gaetan

Re: [openstack-dev] [Mistral]I think Mistral need K8S action

On 16 April 2018 at 05:08, 홍선군 wrote: > Thanks for your reply. > > > > I will refer to this Ansible action and developing actions for K8S > somewhere externally. > Great. Do let us know when you start someting - I would be interested in giving feedback and testing or

Re: [openstack-dev] [placement] Anchor/Relay Providers

On 04/16/2018 04:16 PM, Eric Fried wrote: I was presenting an example using VM-ish resource classes, because I can write them down and everybody knows what I'm talking about without me having to explain what they are. But remember we want placement to be usable outside of Nova as well. But

Re: [openstack-dev] [placement] Anchor/Relay Providers

I was presenting an example using VM-ish resource classes, because I can write them down and everybody knows what I'm talking about without me having to explain what they are. But remember we want placement to be usable outside of Nova as well. But also, I thought we had situations where the

Re: [openstack-dev] Removing networking-mlnx from Debian?

On 2018-04-13 14:17:29 + (+), Moshe Levi wrote: [...] > Yes, How can we add python3 job in zuul for testing it? I've proposed https://review.openstack.org/561703 to add the corresponding Python3.5 version of your unit test jobs. Looks like it's passing if you want to the

[openstack-dev] [Elections][TC] Announcing Davanum Srinivas (dims) candidacy for TC

Team, Please consider my candidacy for Rocky. Please see my previous two candidacy statements [1][2], participation in TC deliberations [3] and recent bootstrap of SIG-OpenStack/SIG-Kubernetes cross community collaboration [4] with the Kubernetes/CNCF communities. With the OpenLab initiative, we

Re: [openstack-dev] [placement] Anchor/Relay Providers

Sorry it took so long to respond. Comments inline. On 03/30/2018 08:34 PM, Eric Fried wrote: Folks who care about placement (but especially Jay and Tetsuro)- I was reviewing [1] and was at first very unsatisfied that we were not returning the anchor providers in the results. But as I started

[openstack-dev] [ironic] this week's priorities and subteam reports

Hi, We are glad to present this week's priorities and subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. This Week's Priorities (as of the weekly ironic meeting) Weekly priorities

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas][fwaas][vmware-nsx] Stable/queens build sphinx docs broken

Maybe we should consider unblocking the stable versions at the moment and then enabling us to address in each project. On 4/16/18, 5:34 PM, "Jeremy Stanley" wrote: On 2018-04-16 10:49:17 + (+), Gary Kotton wrote: > We have seen that a number of stable

Re: [openstack-dev] [rally][dragonflow][ec2-api][PowerVMStackers][murano] Tagging rights

Hi Sean! Thanks for raising this question. As for Rally team, we are using self-tagging approach for several reasons: - Release notes Check the difference between https://github.com/openstack/nova/releases/tag/17.0.2 and https://github.com/openstack/rally-openstack/releases/tag/1.0.0. The

Re: [openstack-dev] [sdk][osc][openstackclient] Migration to storyboard complete

Hello Ben :) As I've been the one poking at PTLs and doing most of the test migrations I've been tracking the work here[1] on this StoryBoard board. There's a story for it all too, but its much easier to see progress and status on the board. If you or anyone has questions please ping me directly

Re: [openstack-dev] [sdk][osc][openstackclient] Migration to storyboard complete

On 04/14/2018 02:29 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 11:37:46AM -0500, Monty Taylor wrote: Hey everybody, The migration of the openstacksdk and python-openstackclient repositories to storyboard has been completed. Each of the repos owned by those teams has been migrated, and

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas][fwaas][vmware-nsx] Stable/queens build sphinx docs broken

On 2018-04-16 10:49:17 + (+), Gary Kotton wrote: > We have seen that a number of stable projects that the sphinx docs > is broken. The gate job returns ‘retry limit’. An example of the > error is >

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack][infra] pip vs psutil

2018-04-16 7:46 GMT+00:00 Ian Wienand : > On 04/15/2018 09:32 PM, Gary Kotton wrote: >> >> The gate is currently broken with >> https://launchpad.net/bugs/1763966. >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/561427/ >> Can unblock us in the short term. Any other ideas? > > > I'm

[openstack-dev] [election][tc] TC Candidacy for Graham Hayes

Hi, I am submitting my candidacy for the OpenStack Technical Committee. I have been contributing to OpenStack since the Havana cycle [1][2], mainly in Designate. I have also been involved with the TC, and its meetings since Designate applied for incubation all the way back in Atlanta (the first

[openstack-dev] [Os-brick][Cinder] NVMe-oF NQN string

Hi, I'm wondering why in Os-brick implementation of NVMe-oF in os_brick/initiator/connectors/nvme.py, line 97 we do split on 'nqn'. Connection properties, including 'nqn', are provided by Cinder driver and when user want to implement new driver that will use NVMe-of he/she needs to create NQN

[openstack-dev] [nova] Notification update week 16

Hi, After the long silence here is the current notification status info. Bugs New bugs [Low] https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1757407 Notification sending sometimes hits the keystone API to get glance endpoints As the versioned notifications does not use the glance

[openstack-dev] [nova][xenapi] does get_all_bw_counters driver call nova-network only?

Hi, The get_all_bw_counters() virt driver [1] is only supported by xenapi today. However Matt raised the question [2] if this is a nova-network only feature. As in that case we can simply remove it. Cheers, gibi [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas][fwaas][vmware-nsx][ovn] Stable/queens build sphinx docs broken

Hi, Here is an example - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/560893/ Thanks Gary From: Gary Kotton Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Monday, April 16, 2018 at 2:28 PM To: OpenStack List Subject: Re:

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas][fwaas][vmware-nsx][ovn] Stable/queens build sphinx docs broken

Hi, OVN too. Things were working on the 12th of April and something has changed since then. Thanks Gary From: Gary Kotton Reply-To: OpenStack List Date: Monday, April 16, 2018 at 1:49 PM To: OpenStack List

[openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas][fwaas][vmware-nsx] Stable/queens build sphinx docs broken

Hi, We have seen that a number of stable projects that the sphinx docs is broken. The gate job returns ‘retry limit’. An example of the error is http://logs.openstack.org/22/561522/1/check/build-openstack-sphinx-docs/cd99af8/job-output.txt.gz Does anyone have any idea how to address this? Thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][dynamic routing] RYU Breaks lower constraints

I just sent a patch to bump Ryu version in Neutron’s requirements to fix lower constraints job there also: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/561579/ > Wiadomość napisana przez Gary Kotton w dniu 16.04.2018, > o godz. 09:13: > > Please see

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][stable][tc] Kolla deployment guide link is missing on docs.o.o

Thanks Andreas, patch is pushed, please check https://review.openstack.org/#/c/561578/ On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 6:02 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 2018-04-16 11:52, Jeffrey Zhang wrote: > > Seems kolla deployment guide doc link is missing here[0]. But it exists > > on pike[1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][stable][tc] Kolla deployment guide link is missing on docs.o.o

On 2018-04-16 11:52, Jeffrey Zhang wrote: > Seems kolla deployment guide doc link is missing here[0]. But it exists > on pike[1] and ocata[2] > > How could we fix this? See https://docs.openstack.org/doc-contrib-guide/doc-index.html and sent a patch for openstack-manuals repository, Andreas >

Re: [openstack-dev] Removing networking-mlnx from Debian?

What are the python3 issues that you see? tox -epy34 and all the unit test are passing? (tested on cento 7.4) [1] networking_mlnx.tests.unit.ml2.drivers.sdn.test_mechanism_sdn.SdnDriverTestCase.test_port_processing_network 2.642

[openstack-dev] [kolla][stable][tc] Kolla deployment guide link is missing on docs.o.o

Seems kolla deployment guide doc link is missing here[0]. But it exists on pike[1] and ocata[2] How could we fix this? [0] https://docs.openstack.org/queens/deploy/ [1] https://docs.openstack.org/pike/deploy/ ​[2] https://docs.openstack.org/ocata/deploy/​ -- Regards, Jeffrey Zhang Blog:

[openstack-dev] [glance] Priorities for WC 16th of April

Hi all, Now when client release is out and milestone 1 is approaching quickly I'd like to draw your attention to few things in Glance development. 1) reviews of outstanding specs 2) work towards removal of the Images API v1 3) Pending delete rollback ability Lets get the reviews to specs so we

[openstack-dev] [horizon] Meeting time and location are changed

Hi team, Please be informed that Horizon meeting time has been changed [1]. We'll have our weekly meetings at 15.00 UTC starting this week at 'openstack-meeting-alt' channel. We had to change meeting channel too due to the conflict with others. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/560979/

[openstack-dev] [bandit] Migration to PyCQA

Hi All, As most of you are aware, a decision was made to migrate the maintenance of Bandit to PyCQA [0]. In order to kick things off, I have started a pad [1] to make sure we capture all the steps needed for a seamless migration. Please do look at this and provide input / feedback. @Jeremy,

[openstack-dev] [stable][trove] keep trove-stable-maint members up-to-date

Hi , core stable team, There are some patches to stable branches to the different trove repos, and they are always progressing slowly ,because none of the current trove team core members are in the trove-stable-maint. I tried to contact with the previous PTLs about expanding the

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack][infra] pip vs psutil

On 04/15/2018 09:32 PM, Gary Kotton wrote: The gate is currently broken with https://launchpad.net/bugs/1763966. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/561427/ Can unblock us in the short term. Any other ideas? I'm thinking this is probably along the lines of the best idea. I left a fairly long

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack][infra] pip vs psutil

Right. Thx Gary :) > Wiadomość napisana przez Gary Kotton w dniu 16.04.2018, > o godz. 09:14: > > Hi, > I think that we need https://review.openstack.org/561471 until we have a > proper solution. > Thanks > Gary > > On 4/16/18, 10:13 AM, "Slawomir Kaplonski"

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack][infra] pip vs psutil

Hi, I think that we need https://review.openstack.org/561471 until we have a proper solution. Thanks Gary On 4/16/18, 10:13 AM, "Slawomir Kaplonski" wrote: Hi, I just wanted to ask if there is any ongoing work on

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][dynamic routing] RYU Breaks lower constraints

Please see https://review.openstack.org/561443 On 4/16/18, 2:31 AM, "IWAMOTO Toshihiro" wrote: On Sun, 15 Apr 2018 21:02:42 +0900, Gary Kotton wrote: > > [1 ] > [1.1 ] > Hi, > That sounds reasonable. I wonder if the RYU folk can chime in

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack][infra] pip vs psutil

Hi, I just wanted to ask if there is any ongoing work on https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/1763966 to fix grenade failures? It looks that e.g. all grenade jobs in neutron are broken currently :/ > Wiadomość napisana przez Gary Kotton w dniu 15.04.2018, > o godz.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] z/VM introducing a new config driveformat

Thanks for the question and comments >>> metadata service question Fully agree metadata is something that we need support, and as it need some network setup on NAT ,as you pointed out, without metadata there are some functions missing ; so it's already in our support plan , currently we plan to