[openstack-dev] [kolla] role change and introductions

team has made great strides in improving the documentation, keep it going! Second, there will be 2 others from my ppc64le team getting involved in Kolla, Mark Hamzy and Ed Leafe. Ed will be attending PTG and will try to get a chance to meet a few of you there. Kurt Taylor (krtaylor

[openstack-dev] [kolla] Documentation restructure and refresh

. Thanks in advance to anyone that wants to help. Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) (1) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/504801 (2) https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kolla-queens-doc-restructure (3) https://blueprints.launchpad.net/kolla/+spec/queens-doc-restructure

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Ironic-qa meeting canceled this week (Nov 23rd)

. Comments? Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Driver removal policies - should we make it softer?

In my opinion, we have to be careful about the "supported" label. Saying that third-party tested drivers are community supported implies a commitment that may have not been intended. Personally, I see no problem with leaving everything just as planned. Drivers that are in tree are either tested

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] About third-party CI

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 8:21 AM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > Hi Ironicers, > > This email serves as a reminder (and a bit of a call to action) about our > third party CI policy: > http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/ironic-specs/specs/ > not-implemented/third-party-ci.html

[openstack-dev] [ironic] third party CI systems - vendor requirement milestones status

a few folks with edits, but please review this info and let me know if you have any changes. You can make needed changes yourself, but let me know so I can keep track. Thanks! Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) __ OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Clarifications about ThirdParty CI deadlines

> > This is just a way to test your CI system without posting garbage to the ironic project patch comments. The sandbox is a place to post comments on a test pass and verify that it all llooks good and satisfies the

[openstack-dev] [ironic] third party driver CI testing m-2 milestone reminder

3] Let me know if you have any questions. [1] https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/ironic-specs/specs/not-implemented/third-party-ci.html [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems [3] http://docs.openstack.org/infra/system-config/third_party.html Kurt Taylor

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Do we need to have a mid-cycle?

; > My preference is 4) no mid-cycle -- and try to work more effectively with > people in different locations and time zones. > I was hoping to suggest that we have a mid-cycle co-located with neutron, but they are not having a mid-cycle. So, my preference would be 4) no mid cycle. I would l

[openstack-dev] [third-party] Third party CI working group chair

with this weeks meeting, Tuesday, Sept. 15th, 1700UTC in #openstack-meeting. I'm really proud of what we have accomplished since the formation of the working group. Please join us on Tuesday and get involved, there is still much more to do. Thanks! Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki

[openstack-dev] [third-party] Third Party CI Working Group Meeting Tuesday June 23 1700UTC

and preparing for the common CI virtual sprint, among other things. Please try to attend if at all possible. As always, feel free to add items to the agenda and we will get to them as time permits. Thanks! Kurt Taylor (krtaylor

[openstack-dev] [third-party] Weekly Third Party CI Working Group meeting change

on Tuesday, June 23rd. Note that this skips next week since we are dropping the 0400 meeting time. The meetings will continue bi-weekly: June 23rd, July 7th, July 21st, August 4th... I will send out reminders to make sure that everyone remembers this transition. Thanks! Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) [1] https

[openstack-dev] [third-party] Weekly Third Party CI Working Group meeting Wednesday June 10th 1500UTC

. Please try to attend if at all possible. As always, feel free to add items to the agenda and we will get to them as time permits. Thanks! Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions

[openstack-dev] [third-party] Announcing Third Party CI Tools Repo

meeting and discuss, or just submit a patch. Thanks! Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartyCIWorkingGroup [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/175520 [3] https://github.com/stackforge/third-party-ci-tools [4] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartyCIWorkingGroup

Re: [openstack-dev] [third-party][infra] Third-Party CI Operators: Let's use a common CI Solution!

Thanks Ramy! I'd suggest that we use the cross-project session I proposed [1] for Liberty summit as a working session primarily focused on this work [2]. [1] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1vCTZBJKCMZ2xBhglnuK3ciKo3E8UMFo5S5lmIAYMCSE/edit?usp=sharing [2]

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Hypervisor support matrix now in GIT

On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:24:24AM -0600, Kurt Taylor wrote: On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:31 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: Hi Team Nova, This is a message to alert everyone to the fact

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Hypervisor support matrix now in GIT

On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:31 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: Hi Team Nova, This is a message to alert everyone to the fact that the old hypervisor support matrix on the wiki[1], should really be considered obsolete. The canonical location for it going forward will be

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Hypervisor support matrix now in GIT

__ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev Thanks Matt, I'll include that in the patch. Kurt Taylor (krtaylor

[openstack-dev] [Keystone] PowerKVM CI reporting

Just FYI, in case there was any questions, In addition to testing and reporting on Nova, the IBM PowerKVM CI system is now also testing against Keystone patches. We are happy to also be testing keystone patches on PowerKVM, and will be adding other projects soon. Regards, Kurt Taylor (krtaylor

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] PowerKVM CI reporting

Thanks Morgan, That's why I wanted to email. We will gladly come to a meeting and formally request to comment and will turn off commenting on Keystone until then. Thanks, Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Morgan Fainberg morgan.fainb...@gmail.com wrote: I assumed [my

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] PowerKVM CI reporting

On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On 2/2/2015 3:52 PM, Kurt Taylor wrote: Thanks Morgan, That's why I wanted to email. We will gladly come to a meeting and formally request to comment and will turn off commenting on Keystone until

Re: [openstack-dev] [third-party] Third-party CI Documentation sprint, January 21-23

Just a reminder, the third-party documentation sprint is happening now. Come help if you can! Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Kurt Taylor kurt.r.tay...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all, The OpenStack Third-party CI working group will be hosting a virtual sprint

[openstack-dev] [third-party] Third-party CI Documentation sprint, January 21-23

the sprint would be great so we could review and close out the patches as they come in. Thanks everyone! Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][ThirdPartyCI][PCI] Intel Third party Hardware based CI for PCI

/openstack-infra/system-config/tree/doc/source/third_party.rst Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 11:18 PM, yongli he yongli...@intel.com wrote: 在 2015年01月08日 10:31, yongli he 写道: to make a more stable service we upgrade the networking device, then the log server address change

[openstack-dev] [third-party] Third-party CI meeting change

. Refer to the meetings page for more details: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings#Third_Party_Meeting Thanks, Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Stefano Maffulli stef...@openstack.org wrote: On 12/05/2014 07:08 AM, Kurt Taylor wrote: 1. Meeting content: Having 2 meetings per week is more than is needed at this stage of the working group. There just isn't enough meeting content to justify having two

Re: [openstack-dev] [Third-party] Voting for new Third-party CI weekly IRC meeting time

for us! Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote: On 12/09/2014 11:55 AM, Anita Kuno wrote: On 12/09/2014 08:32 AM, Kurt Taylor wrote: All of the feedback so far has supported moving the existing IRC Third-party CI meeting to better fit

Re: [openstack-dev] [Third-party] Voting for new Third-party CI weekly IRC meeting time

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote: On 12/15/2014 10:55 AM, Kurt Taylor wrote: Anita, please, creating yet another meeting time without input from anyone just confuses the issue. When I ask people to attend meetings to reduce noise on the mailing list

[openstack-dev] [Third-party] Voting for new Third-party CI weekly IRC meeting time

/e=21b93c Please vote on the time that is best for you. I would like to finalize the new times this week. Thanks! Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo

Re: [openstack-dev] [Third-party] Voting for new Third-party CI weekly IRC meeting time

on this. Thanks again for everything that you do for us! Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote: On 12/09/2014 08:32 AM, Kurt Taylor wrote: All of the feedback so far has supported moving the existing IRC Third-party CI meeting to better fit

Re: [openstack-dev] [Third-party] Voting for new Third-party CI weekly IRC meeting time

for taking the time to vote. Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Kurt Taylor kurt.r.tay...@gmail.com wrote: All of the feedback so far has supported moving the existing IRC Third-party CI meeting to better fit a worldwide audience. The consensus is that we will have only 1

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party

at: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings) I volunteered to chair, then ask other CI Operators to chair as the meetings evolved. The meeting times could be any between 1300-0300 UTC. That way, one week we are good for US and Europe, the next week for APAC. Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) On Wed, Dec 3

[openstack-dev] [third-party] Third-party CI documentation WG forming

can decide how to proceed. Since the Infra manual virtual sprint was such a success, how would everyone feel about a 2 day third-party CI documentation virtual sprint? I think we could bang out a pretty nice doc in that timeframe. Thanks! Kurt Taylor (krtaylor

[openstack-dev] [Third-party] Third-party CI WG Meeting

Hi, Reminder: the Third-party Work Group meeting for this week (November 3) has been cancelled due to Summit. We will resume our normal time next week. The meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ThirdParty Kurt Taylor (krtaylor

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Welcome three new members to project-config-core

Congratulations everyone, well deserved! Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: With unanimous consent[1][2][3] of the OpenStack Project Infrastructure core team (infra-core), I'm pleased to welcome Andreas Jaeger, Anita Kuno and Sean

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] OpenStack bootstrapping hour - Friday Sept 19th - 3pm EST

On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Rochelle.RochelleGrober rochelle.gro...@huawei.com wrote: +1000 This is *great*. Not only for newbies, but refreshers, learning different approaches, putting faces to the signatures, etc. And Mock best practices is a brilliant starting place for developers.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] collecting recheck command to re-trigger third party CI

. Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) Thanks, doug On 9/3/14, 8:57 PM, trinath.soman...@freescale.com trinath.soman...@freescale.com wrote: This is a Good option to go with. To trigger a specific CI, CI can have their own string or in a community specified format. Like retrigger-freescale

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

on everything we expect to see a vote from, so that it's very clear that one is missing, then that's a net win right there. There is a similar old bug for that, with a good suggestion for how it could possibly be done: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ci/+bug/1251758 Kurt Taylor (krtaylor

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

information, and waited longer, we'd be in a worse state. Maybe it could promptly timeout and then report the system that did not complete? That would also have the benefit of enforcing a time limit on reporting results. Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) OpenStack Development Lead - PowerKVM CI IBM Linux

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [3rd party testing] Atlanta meetup for 3rd party testing?

not worked out all the details for when and where to meet, but I would be happy to set it up and facilitate the discussion. I wanted to see if there was any interest before I took it any further. Any interest? Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) OpenStack Development Lead - PowerKVM CI IBM Linux Technology

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [3rd party testing] Atlanta meetup for 3rd party testing?

Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote on 04/15/2014 09:41:17 AM: On 04/15/2014 10:20 AM, Kurt Taylor wrote: Sorry if you get this twice. Since summit is approaching quickly, I wanted to see if anyone had interest in forming a meetup for 3rd party testing. This would be a group

Re: [openstack-dev] new (docs) requirement for third party CI

. Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) OpenStack Development - PowerKVM CI IBM Linux Technology Center___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev