Re: [openstack-dev] [rally]404 on docker rallyforge/rally

tack-dev] [rally]404 on docker rallyforge/rally > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Matthieu Simonin > <matthieu.simo...@inria.fr> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Monday morning and it seems that docker images for rally aren't reachable > > anymore. > > > >

[openstack-dev] [rally]404 on docker rallyforge/rally

Hi, Monday morning and it seems that docker images for rally aren't reachable anymore. https://hub.docker.com/r/rallyforge/rally/ Did I miss something ? Is the doc up-to-date[1] ? [1]: http://rally.readthedocs.io/en/0.10.0/install_and_upgrade/install.html#rally-docker Matt

[openstack-dev] [FEMDC] Wed. 11. IRC Meeting 15:00 UTC

Hi all, The next meeting is planned tomorrow/today Wed. 11 Oct. 15:00 UTC A draft agenda is available in the etherpad : https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/massively_distributed_ircmeetings_2017 (line 1317 - at the end) You are very welcome to amend it. Best, Matt - Mail original - >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][oslo.messaging][femdc]Topic names for every resource type RPC endpoint

ine. > > Sadly I don't keep the test examples, I should have stored them in github > or something. It shouldn't be hard to replicate though if you follow the > oslo_messaging docs. > > > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Matthieu Simonin <matthieu.simo...@inria.fr >

[openstack-dev] [neutron][oslo.messaging][femdc]Topic names for every resource type RPC endpoint

Hello, In the Neutron docs about RPCs and Callbacks system, it is said[1] : "With the underlying oslo_messaging support for dynamic topics on the receiver we cannot implement a per “resource type + resource id” topic, rabbitmq seems to handle 1’s of topics without suffering, but creating

Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal for message bus analysis

:) Best, Matt - Mail original - > De: "Matthieu Simonin" <matthieu.simo...@inria.fr> > À: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Envoyé: Jeudi 6 Juillet 2017 16:31:46 > Objet: R

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Looking for Docker images for Cinder, Glance etc for oVirt

Hello, If it helps, we are building on a regular basis a subset of the kolla images. They are pushed in dockerhub under beyondtheclouds namespace [1]. stable/ocata images should be up-to-date, master is tagged latest. Nevertheless some caveats of relying on those tags are mentionned in this

Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal for message bus analysis

d have killed Rabbit earlier in the tests. The split between notification and RPC messaging is interesting in this area. Bye, Matt > > Regards, > > Paul-Andre > > > > -Original Message- > From: Matthieu Simonin <matthieu.simo...@inria.fr> > Reply-

Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal for message bus analysis

we know that? > > I have also left some comments in the doc. > > Paul-Andre > > > -Original Message- > From: Matthieu Simonin <matthieu.simo...@inria.fr> > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (

Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal for message bus analysis

Hi Ken, Thanks for starting this ! I've made a first pass on the epad and left some notes and questions there. Best, Matthieu - Mail original - > De: "Ken Giusti" > À: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] Cockroachdb for Keystone Multi-master

- Mail original - > De: "Thierry Carrez" > À: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Envoyé: Lundi 22 Mai 2017 11:02:21 > Objet: Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] Cockroachdb for Keystone Multi-master > > Mike Bayer wrote: > > On 05/18/2017 06:13 PM, Adrian Turjak

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][osprofiler][keystone][neutron][nova] osprofiler in paste deploy files

ev] [kolla][osprofiler][keystone][neutron][nova] > osprofiler in paste deploy files > > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 4:08 AM, Matthieu Simonin <matthieu.simo...@inria.fr > > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I'd like to have more insight on OSProfiler support in paste-depl

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][osprofiler][keystone][neutron][nova] osprofiler in paste deploy files

- Mail original - > De: "Eduardo Gonzalez" > À: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > Envoyé: Lundi 29 Mai 2017 11:53:53 > Objet: Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][osprofiler][keystone][neutron][nova] >

[openstack-dev] [kolla][osprofiler][keystone][neutron][nova] osprofiler in paste deploy files

Hello, I'd like to have more insight on OSProfiler support in paste-deploy files as it seems not similar across projects. As a result, the way you can enable it on Kolla side differs. Here are some examples: a) Nova paste.ini already contains OSProfiler middleware[1]. b) Keystone paste.ini

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Multi-Regions Support

- Mail original - > De: "Jay Pipes" > À: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Envoyé: Vendredi 6 Janvier 2017 21:42:46 > Objet: Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Multi-Regions Support > > On 01/06/2017 03:23 PM, Sam Yaple wrote: > > This should be read as MariaDB+Galera

Re: [openstack-dev] [Performance][shaker] Triangular topology

rantis.com> > > > À: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" < > > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > > > Envoyé: Jeudi 24 Novembre 2016 13:03:33 > > > Objet: Re: [openstack-dev] [Performance][shaker] > > > > &

Re: [openstack-dev] [Performance][shaker]

he box Shaker doesn't support such topology. > It shouldn't be hard to implement though. Let me check what needs to be > done. > > Thanks, > Ilya > > 2016-11-24 13:49 GMT+03:00 Matthieu Simonin <matthieu.simo...@inria.fr>: > > > Hello, > > > > I'm

[openstack-dev] [Performance][shaker]

Hello, I'm looking to shaker capabilities and I'm wondering if this kind of accomodation (see attachment also) can be achieved Ascii (flat) version : CN1 (2n VMs) <- n flows -> CN2 (2n VMs) CN1 (2n VMs) <- n flows -> CN3 (2n VMs) CN2 (2n VMs) <- n flows -> CN3 (2n VMs) In this situation

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Distributed Database

ighlight that a full time engineer will join our team on July, the 1st. He can re-implement ROME from scratch in an appropriate way (as we know now what is required to make Nova work with Redis, and with the support of OpenStack core-developers, we would be able to improve our proposition and conti

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Distributed Database

- Mail original - > De: "Edward Leafe" > À: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > Envoyé: Samedi 23 Avril 2016 19:12:03 > Objet: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Distributed Database > > On Apr 23, 2016, at