On Mon, Sep 17, 2018, at 8:53 AM, Jay S Bryant wrote:
>
>
> On 9/17/2018 10:46 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote:
> >>> Plan
> >>>
> >>> We would now like to have the driverfixes/ocata branch deleted so there
> >>> is no
> >>> confusion about where backports should go and we don't accidentally get
On 9/17/2018 10:46 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote:
Plan
We would now like to have the driverfixes/ocata branch deleted so there is no
confusion about where backports should go and we don't accidentally get these
out of sync again.
Infra team, please delete this branch or let me know if there is
> >
> > Plan
> >
> > We would now like to have the driverfixes/ocata branch deleted so there is
> > no
> > confusion about where backports should go and we don't accidentally get
> > these
> > out of sync again.
> >
> > Infra team, please delete this branch or let me know if there is a
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018, at 8:00 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote:
> Hello Cinder and Infra teams. Cinder needs some help from infra or some
> pointers on how to proceed.
>
> tl;dr - The openstack/cinder repo had a driverfixes/ocata branch created for
> fixes that no longer met the more restrictive phase II
Hello Cinder and Infra teams. Cinder needs some help from infra or some
pointers on how to proceed.
tl;dr - The openstack/cinder repo had a driverfixes/ocata branch created for
fixes that no longer met the more restrictive phase II stable policy criteria.
Extended maintenance has changed that and
