Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][performance] Proposing tail-based sampling in OSProfiler

pull request), >>> LighStep … by making OSprofiler >>> >>> compatible with OpenTracing API. >>> >>> >>> >>> ICYMI, Boris is father of OSprofiler in OpenStack [1] >>> >>> >>> >>> [1] https://specs.openstack.

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][performance] Proposing tail-based sampling in OSProfiler

pecs.openstack.org/openstack/oslo-specs/specs/mitak >> a/osprofiler-cross-service-project-profiling.html >> >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> >> >> Vinh Nguyen Trong >> >> PODC – Fujitsu Vietnam Ltd. >> >> >> >> *F

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][performance] Proposing tail-based sampling in OSProfiler

/osprofiler-cross-service-project-profiling.html > > > > Best regards, > > > > Vinh Nguyen Trong > > PODC – Fujitsu Vietnam Ltd. > > > > *From:* Rajul Kumar [mailto:kumar.r...@husky.neu.edu] > *Sent:* Friday, 04 August, 2017 03:49 > *To:* OpenStack Deve

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][performance] Proposing tail-based sampling in OSProfiler

jitsu Vietnam Ltd. > > > > *From:* Rajul Kumar [mailto:kumar.r...@husky.neu.edu] > *Sent:* Friday, 04 August, 2017 03:49 > *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][pe

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][performance] Proposing tail-based sampling in OSProfiler

(not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][performance] Proposing tail-based sampling in OSProfiler Hi Boris That is a point of concern. Can you please direct to any of those? Anyways, we don't have anything in place for OpenStack yet. Now,

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][performance] Proposing tail-based sampling in OSProfiler

Hi Boris That is a point of concern. Can you please direct to any of those? Anyways, we don't have anything in place for OpenStack yet. Now, either we pick another tracing solution like Zipkin, Jaeger etc. which have their own limitations OR enhance OSProfiler. We pick the later as it's most

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][performance] Proposing tail-based sampling in OSProfiler

Rajul, May I ask why you think so? Exposed by OSprofiler issues are going to be really hard to fix in current OpenStack architecture. Best regards, Boris Pavlovic On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Rajul Kumar wrote: > Hi Boris > > Good to hear from you. > May I ask

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][performance] Proposing tail-based sampling in OSProfiler

Hi Boris Good to hear from you. May I ask why you think so? We do see some potential with OSProfiler for this and further objectives. Thanks Rajul On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: > Rajul, > > It makes sense! However, maybe it's a bit too late... ;) >

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][performance] Proposing tail-based sampling in OSProfiler

Rajul, It makes sense! However, maybe it's a bit too late... ;) Best regards, Boris Pavlovic On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Rajul Kumar wrote: > Hello everyone > > I have added a blueprint on having tail-based sampling as a sampling > option for continuous tracing

[openstack-dev] [oslo][performance] Proposing tail-based sampling in OSProfiler

Hello everyone I have added a blueprint on having tail-based sampling as a sampling option for continuous tracing in OSProfiler. It would be really helpful to have some thoughts, ideas, comments on this from the community. Continuous tracing provides a good insight on how various transactions