Re: [openstack-dev] [placement] Anchor/Relay Providers

2018-04-16 Thread Jay Pipes
On 04/16/2018 06:23 PM, Eric Fried wrote: I still don't see a use in returning the root providers in the allocation requests -- since there is nothing consuming resources from those providers. And we already return the root_provider_uuid for all providers involved in allocation requests within

Re: [openstack-dev] [placement] Anchor/Relay Providers

2018-04-16 Thread Eric Fried
> I still don't see a use in returning the root providers in the > allocation requests -- since there is nothing consuming resources from > those providers. > > And we already return the root_provider_uuid for all providers involved > in allocation requests within the provider_summaries section.

Re: [openstack-dev] [placement] Anchor/Relay Providers

2018-04-16 Thread Jay Pipes
On 04/16/2018 04:16 PM, Eric Fried wrote: I was presenting an example using VM-ish resource classes, because I can write them down and everybody knows what I'm talking about without me having to explain what they are. But remember we want placement to be usable outside of Nova as well. But

Re: [openstack-dev] [placement] Anchor/Relay Providers

2018-04-16 Thread Eric Fried
I was presenting an example using VM-ish resource classes, because I can write them down and everybody knows what I'm talking about without me having to explain what they are. But remember we want placement to be usable outside of Nova as well. But also, I thought we had situations where the

Re: [openstack-dev] [placement] Anchor/Relay Providers

2018-04-16 Thread Jay Pipes
Sorry it took so long to respond. Comments inline. On 03/30/2018 08:34 PM, Eric Fried wrote: Folks who care about placement (but especially Jay and Tetsuro)- I was reviewing [1] and was at first very unsatisfied that we were not returning the anchor providers in the results. But as I started

Re: [openstack-dev] [placement] Anchor/Relay Providers

2018-03-31 Thread Eric Fried
/me responds to self Good progress has been made here. Tetsuro solved the piece where provider summaries were only showing resources that had been requested - with [8] they show usage information for *all* their resources. In order to make use of both [1] and [8], I had to shuffle them into the

[openstack-dev] [placement] Anchor/Relay Providers

2018-03-30 Thread Eric Fried
Folks who care about placement (but especially Jay and Tetsuro)- I was reviewing [1] and was at first very unsatisfied that we were not returning the anchor providers in the results. But as I started digging into what it would take to fix it, I realized it's going to be nontrivial. I wanted to