On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 03:16:14PM -0400, Matthew Treinish wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:16:37AM +0100, Chris Dent wrote:
> > On Mon, 9 Jul 2018, Matthew Treinish wrote:
> >
> > > It's definitely a bug, and likely a bug in stestr (or one of the lower
> > > level
> > > packages like
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:16:37AM +0100, Chris Dent wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jul 2018, Matthew Treinish wrote:
>
> > It's definitely a bug, and likely a bug in stestr (or one of the lower
> > level
> > packages like testtools or python-subunit), because that's what's generating
> > the return code.
On Mon, 9 Jul 2018, Matthew Treinish wrote:
It's definitely a bug, and likely a bug in stestr (or one of the lower level
packages like testtools or python-subunit), because that's what's generating
the return code. Tox just looks at the return code from the commands to figure
out if things
On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 06:59:42PM -0500, Eric Fried wrote:
> In gabbi, there's a way [1] to mark a test as an expected failure, which
> makes it show up in your stestr run thusly:
>
> {0}
>
In gabbi, there's a way [1] to mark a test as an expected failure, which
makes it show up in your stestr run thusly:
{0}
nova.tests.functional.api.openstack.placement.test_placement_api.allocations-1.28_put_that_allocation_to_new_consumer.test_request
[0.710821s] ... ok
==
Totals
==
Ran:
