On 2017-11-29 12:34 PM, Chris Dent wrote:
> Sufficent answer?
speaking for myself, yes.
--
gord
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
On 2017-11-29 12:31 PM, Anne Bertucio wrote:
> Rereading your question, Gord, the tl;dr of my message is that current
> roadmap is not intended to dictate work or what future features should
> be—just captures and communicates work already in motion.
ah, i see. i was mainly curious to see how
On Wed, 29 Nov 2017, gordon chung wrote:
On 2017-11-28 11:36 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
* A somewhat bizarre presentation suggesting the Board and the TC
manage the OpenStack roadmap. There wasn't time to actually discuss
this as previous topics ran _way_ over, but at a superficial glance
Rereading your question, Gord, the tl;dr of my message is that current roadmap
is not intended to dictate work or what future features should be—just captures
and communicates work already in motion.
Anne Bertucio
Marketing and Certification, OpenStack Foundation
a...@openstack.org |
The community does have an existing Roadmap, albeit this cycle we decided we
need to change how we design the Roadmap and its final form. We have a small
community Roadmap team (anyone want to join?!) who compiles this information.
In the past, the Roadmap aimed to be a document for both
On 2017-11-28 11:36 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
> * A somewhat bizarre presentation suggesting the Board and the TC
> manage the OpenStack roadmap. There wasn't time to actually discuss
> this as previous topics ran _way_ over, but at a superficial glance
> it appeared to involve a complete
https://anticdent.org/tc-report-48.html>
Due to the recent Summit in Sydney, related travel, and Thanksgiving,
it has been a while since I put a TC Report together. It is hard to
get back in the groove. Much of the recent discussion has either been
reflecting on Summit-initiated discussions or
