On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Jamie Lennox wrote:
>
> So I'm not going to comment too much on the quality of the library as i
> obviously think it's good
>
acahcpahch, no worries.
Your insights are invaluable - thanks for taking the time to connect some
dots for me -
On 11 October 2016 at 16:23, Clay Gerrard wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> Anyone have any experience to share positive or negative using
> requests-mock? I see it's been used to replace another dependency that had
> some problems in many of the OpenStack python client libraries:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Clay Gerrard
wrote:
> I'm not really sure what a fixture is this context?
>
Answered my own question in this case!
http://requests-mock.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fixture.html
It's one of *these* of course:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 5:40 AM, Ian Cordasco
wrote:
> So, as a core developer
> of Requests, I would endorse requests-mock for this category of
> dependency.
>
Excellent; exactly the kind of feedback I was hoping to solicit. If you're
looking to add this catagory of
ck.org>
Subject: [openstack-dev] requests-mock
> Greetings!
>
> Anyone have any experience to share positive or negative using
> requests-mock? I see it's been used to replace another dependency that had
> some problems in many of the OpenStack python client libraries:
>
>
Clay,
Apologies for the top post. Here's the current recommendation on
dependencies - Answering your question on "I'm not acctually sure what
the OpenStack policy is on dependency hygiene :D Anyway,":
https://github.com/openstack/requirements#global-requirements-for-openstack-projects
There is
Greetings!
Anyone have any experience to share positive or negative using
requests-mock? I see it's been used to replace another dependency that had
some problems in many of the OpenStack python client libraries:
Added to global requirements -> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104067
Added to