Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core Team Review - March 2016

2016-03-06 Thread Lana Brindley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I agree, bug triage generally is a wonderful thing to be doing, and is also somewhat under valued. So your contribution is definitely noticed and appreciated! :) Lana On 05/03/16 00:07, Anne Gentle wrote: > Atsushi, you have been a lifesaver in

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core Team Review - March 2016

2016-03-04 Thread Anne Gentle
Atsushi, you have been a lifesaver in triaging the openstack-api-site bugs! Much appreciated. Our workflow is so smooth and fluid since you've joined, thank you so much. Anne On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Atsushi SAKAI wrote: > Lana > > Thank you for commenting me. >

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core Team Review - March 2016

2016-03-04 Thread Atsushi SAKAI
Lana Additionally, I found. Following Karma seems high for Matt and me. > > >> Current cores not appearing in any stats: https://launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+topcontributors https://launchpad.net/openstack-api-site/+topcontributors Hopefully, launchpad karma affects the stats :-)

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core Team Review - March 2016

2016-03-03 Thread Atsushi SAKAI
Lana Thank you for commenting me. > I use the russelbryant stats > http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/documentation-group/90 > I haven't heard anything specific from Atsushi-san. I am doing launchpad bugs reviewing mainly (api-site and manuals) (but I recognize working contribution

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core Team Review - March 2016

2016-03-03 Thread Lana Brindley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I use the russelbryant stats (which are linked in the headers), because of comments made on this list back when we changed the process. The main reason, IIRC, was because it was more specific to openstack-manuals. Happy to reopen that

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core Team Review - March 2016

2016-03-03 Thread Anne Gentle
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 8:16 AM, Mariia Zlatkova wrote: > I thought we were using this link: > http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/documentation-group/90 > > To root cause this misperception, I want to point out that I clicked the links in the column headers. Lana,

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core Team Review - March 2016

2016-03-03 Thread Mariia Zlatkova
I thought we were using this link: http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/documentation-group/90 Maria On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Steve Gordon wrote: > - Original Message - > > From: "Anne Gentle" > > To: "Andreas Jaeger"

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core Team Review - March 2016

2016-03-03 Thread Steve Gordon
- Original Message - > From: "Anne Gentle" > To: "Andreas Jaeger" > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > > > On 2016-03-03 01:19, Lana Brindley wrote: > > > Hi core team, > > > > > > Here's the core

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core Team Review - March 2016

2016-03-03 Thread Anne Gentle
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 7:45 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 2016-03-03 14:40, Anne Gentle wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Andreas Jaeger > > wrote: > > > > On 2016-03-03 01:19, Lana Brindley wrote: > > > Hi

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core Team Review - March 2016

2016-03-03 Thread Anne Gentle
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 2016-03-03 01:19, Lana Brindley wrote: > > Hi core team, > > > > Here's the core reviewer stats for this month[1]: > > > > Current cores not appearing in any stats: > > Matthew Kassawara > > > > Matt has been working hard

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core Team Review - March 2016

2016-03-03 Thread Anne Gentle
Right, I don't think we should drop or add anyone. Matt, I would like to know, why haven't you done any reviews since October? I thought you were reviewing the networking guide which isn't so release-specific? Thanks, Anne On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Lana Brindley

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core Team Review - March 2016

2016-03-03 Thread Mariia Zlatkova
Yay! :) On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Kato, Tomoyuki wrote: > > My recommendation for September is: > > Drop: no one > > Add: no one > > > > Yay or nay? > > Yay for February :) > > KATO Tomoyuki > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core >

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core Team Review - March 2016

2016-03-03 Thread Kato, Tomoyuki
> My recommendation for September is: > Drop: no one > Add: no one > > Yay or nay? Yay for February :) KATO Tomoyuki -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core Post to : openstack-doc-core@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core More help

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core Team Review - March 2016

2016-03-03 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On 2016-03-03 01:19, Lana Brindley wrote: > Hi core team, > > Here's the core reviewer stats for this month[1]: > > Current cores not appearing in any stats: > Matthew Kassawara > > Matt has been working hard on Install Guide testing (which doesn’t run > through Gerrit), so this is expected.

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core Team Review - March 2016

2016-03-02 Thread shilla . saebi
That sounds good to me. Yay Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 2, 2016, at 7:19 PM, Lana Brindley wrote: > > Hi core team, > > Here's the core reviewer stats for this month[1]: > > Current cores not appearing in any stats: > Matthew Kassawara > > Matt has been

[Openstack-doc-core] Core Team Review - March 2016

2016-03-02 Thread Lana Brindley
Hi core team, Here's the core reviewer stats for this month[1]: Current cores not appearing in any stats: Matthew Kassawara Matt has been working hard on Install Guide testing (which doesn’t run through Gerrit), so this is expected. It’s also expected to impact the stats of other core