We've recently added jobs for Ironic seed and undercloud support, and
landed TripleO support for Ironic.
Cores - please treat the *seed* ironic job as voting the same as all
our other jobs.
However, the ironic undercloud job currentl fails, because of
https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ci/+bug/
Hello,
We need to do some internal regression tests against our cloud when
openstack/heat patches are submitted. Our internal ci does not need to
be able to vote.
1. public key:
ssh-rsa
B3NzaC1yc2EDAQABAAABAQCzaGD+eUSxzEhBH4LjVFtHWAbaCeLgRq2aBAjuf+YuRhj2IS7133t/oWcZdNhi2XzZ2cZzO/30G
On 2014-03-06 17:27:22 + (+), Bob Ball wrote:
> Can we request citrix_xenserver_ci to be moved to the Voting
> third party CI group please.
[...]
I took care of it earlier today when you reminded me in IRC. Sorry
this one slipped through the cracks for several weeks!
--
Jeremy Stanley
_
On 2014-03-26 10:50:49 -0700 (-0700), James E. Blair wrote:
> We've been discussing the thoroughly interesting problem of project
> taxonomy recently, and I'd like to describe what I think we've mostly
> decided we should do and make sure we're on the same page.
[...]
Works for me, and accurately
On 2014-03-27 18:47:23 +0400 (+0400), Sergey Lukjanov wrote:
> The idea was to cleanup openstack* organizations IIRC, but IMO we
> could do the same with stackforge too.
CruftForge ;)
--
Jeremy Stanley
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@l
The idea was to cleanup openstack* organizations IIRC, but IMO we
could do the same with stackforge too.
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Ruslan Kamaldinov
wrote:
>> Murano is not the only project which has deprecated repositories. There are
>> several abandoned repositories, for instance MRaaS [
> Murano is not the only project which has deprecated repositories. There are
> several abandoned repositories, for instance MRaaS [0]. Maybe it's about time
> to create something similar to Apache Attic [1] and move these repos outside
> of Stackforge?
Ah, sorry. I missed the whole point of the
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> James E. Blair wrote:
>> We've been discussing the thoroughly interesting problem of project
>> taxonomy recently, and I'd like to describe what I think we've mostly
>> decided we should do and make sure we're on the same page. If we are,
>
James E. Blair wrote:
> We've been discussing the thoroughly interesting problem of project
> taxonomy recently, and I'd like to describe what I think we've mostly
> decided we should do and make sure we're on the same page. If we are,
> I'll invite the TC to weigh in and if they think we're compl
