Account created and ready to use.
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote:
On 06/25/2014 11:48 AM, David Pineau wrote:
Hello,
I currently work on Cinder for my company, Scality. We plan to work on other
parts of openstack in the near future too, and as such,
Account created and ready to use.
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote:
On 07/02/2014 11:33 AM, Subramani Ramanathan wrote:
Thank You Anita for clarifying it.
Below account information should be fine:-
Username: ib-ipam-ci
Full Name: IB IPAM CI
Thanks,
On 07/03/2014 07:54 AM, Lucas Eznarriaga wrote:
Hi,
Due to maintenance reasons, our CI results server has been moved to a new
machine.
As we didn't use a dns name before, previous links posted on the
review.openstack.org will appear as broken but they're still available
changing the
Hi Anita,
For sure it will help including this info on the third party documentation
and I am willing to contribute :)
I have seen that other third party systems also use a hardcoded IP which
may lead to the same issue in the future.
I would patch this sentence:
Include a public link to all test
On 07/03/2014 09:37 AM, Lucas Eznarriaga wrote:
Hi Anita,
For sure it will help including this info on the third party documentation
and I am willing to contribute :)
I have seen that other third party systems also use a hardcoded IP which
may lead to the same issue in the future.
Yes, it
On Wed, 2014-07-02 at 19:15 -0700, Monty Taylor wrote:
On 07/02/2014 07:07 PM, Ying Chun Guo wrote:
Hello, Elizabeth
I could try to be infrastructure meeting.
When is the next infrastructure meeting?
Now we cannot create new projects in Transifex.
See:
Looks like there are no objections to this nomination so I have made Marc
and Darragh Jenkins Job Builder Core reviewers. Congrats guys and keep the
reviews rolling.
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Darragh Bailey daragh.bai...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 20 June 2014 22:01, James E. Blair
Hi,
I don't see NetScaler CI system listed in this.
Yes, we haven't been voting consistently. But is that the reason?
https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/270,members
Is it based on number of votes?
Because our test infrastructure is programmed to test/vote only on LBaaS
changes, we don't
Thanks Elizabeth!
So, looks like Voting Third-Party CI Group members have voting rights while
Third-Party CI don't have.
Thanks,
Vijay V.
-Original Message-
From: Elizabeth K. Joseph [mailto:l...@princessleia.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2014 11:52 PM
To: Vijay Venkatachalam
Cc:
On 07/03/2014 02:47 PM, Octavian Ciuhandu (Cloudbase Solutions SRL) wrote:
Hi Anita,
We are currently fixing all links to open in the browser. Will get back very
soon with the confirmation that all has been implemented. We will also make
sure that even the rootwrap.d folders that are
Hi Anita,
We are currently fixing all links to open in the browser. Will get back very
soon with the confirmation that all has been implemented. We will also make
sure that even the rootwrap.d folders that are currently as tar.gz will be
browsable directly.
Thank you,
Octavian.
On 3 Jul
I am pleased to announce git-review 1.24 is officially released
today (Thursday, July 3, 2014). This version brings together 77 new
changes from 20 different collaborators including fixes for 15
bugs and a variety of other improvements:
URL:
Hi Monty, Daisy, Mark and others,
The current situation is unexpected to Zanata team, the Zanata team picked EAP
to start only because it went through more testing comparing to community
version of WildFly, however Zanata team has already started more integration
testing on Zanata with
On 07/04/2014 01:30 AM, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
git.openstack.org http://git.openstack.org has an up-to-date
log: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/neutron-specs/log/
Unfortunately I don't know what the policy is for syncing repos with github.
they should sync automatically, something
14 matches
Mail list logo
