Our maintenance has concluded successfully without incident and the
accompanying Gerrit outage was roughly an hour.
We moved 10 repositories to new Git namespaces:
stackforge/congress -> openstack/congress
stackforge/murano -> openstack/murano
stackforge/murano-agent -> openstack/mura
On 2015-04-17 15:50:39 -0400 (-0400), Emilien Macchi (CIVS poll supervisor)
wrote:
> A Condorcet Internet Voting Service poll named Puppet OpenStack
> project naming has been created. You have been designated as a
> voter
[...]
OpenStack Proposal Bot gets to vote in _all_ the good elections.
--
A Condorcet Internet Voting Service poll named Puppet OpenStack project naming
has been created.
You have been designated as a voter by the poll supervisor,
Emilien Macchi (emil...@redhat.com).
Description of poll:
Vote for Puppet OpenStack project name if Puppetlabs decide we can't use
PuppetOp
On 2015-04-17 18:38:11 +0300 (+0300), Sergey Slypushenko wrote:
[...]
> It should be look like review.openstack.org or github works. It is
> lead us to necessity of keeping public key in our application.
> Basically, it is ok, but if Openstackid.org is planning to be
> widely used, it will be good
Our team is now working on Refstack project. From technical side it is a
Web application with Web UI and CLI client. We are planning to use
openstackid.org as auth and user_info provider. Auth with OpenID should
work fine for WebUI, but unfortunately, OpenID/OAuth are not very suitable
for auth in
