Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party][openstack][CI] Examples required for "single_node_ci_data.yaml" config file

Hi Ramy, The image build seems to be working fine now but while running the command "*nodepool image-upload all 'dpc'*" its is failing with the following error: 2016-05-11 10:58:43,233 INFO gear.Connection.nodepool: Disconnected from 127.0.0.1 port 4730 2016-05-11 10:58:43,234 INFO

[OpenStack-Infra] [infra] Jobs failing : "No matching distribution found for "

So it seems the just released pip 8.1.2 has brought in a new version of setuptools with it, which creates canonical names per [1] by replacing "." with "-". The upshot is that pip is now looking for the wrong name on our local mirrors. e.g. --- $ pip --version pip 8.1.2 from

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] An idea to help browse and troubleshoot Ansible Playbook runs

This is really neat, nice work David! I can see this being useful for zuulv3 or even just infra runs as more of our tooling moves to ansible :-) On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:24 AM, David Moreau Simard wrote: > Hi openstack-infra, > > I've been hacking on an idea since last

[OpenStack-Infra] An idea to help browse and troubleshoot Ansible Playbook runs

Hi openstack-infra, I've been hacking on an idea since last friday and I was thinking it could be of interest for you guys as Ansible users, but also considering the next generation of Zuul jobs will be powered by Ansible. The project I'm working on is called ARA [1]. It is very much an alpha at

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] binary package install - plan of attack

On 11 May 2016 at 08:24, Paul Belanger wrote: > I don't have an issue with having 2 profiles. But as it stands today, we'll > only > be able to install one profile in the gate (the test profile based on Andreas > patch). > > So, we can agree what the profile look like

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] binary package install - plan of attack

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 07:47:34AM +1200, Robert Collins wrote: > On 11 May 2016 at 03:45, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > > On 05/09/2016 11:11 AM, Robert Collins wrote: > >> [...] > >> Testing only dependencies should be in the test profile. > >> > >> We may want to have a source or

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] binary package install - plan of attack

On 11 May 2016 at 02:09, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 2016-05-09 19:47, Robert Collins wrote: >> >> On 9 May 2016 9:20 PM, "Andreas Jaeger" > > wrote: >> >>> >>> And then invoke "bindep test" and that would install both packages, >> correct? >>

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party][openstack][CI] Examples required for "single_node_ci_data.yaml" config file

It’s documented here: http://docs.openstack.org/infra/openstackci/third_party_ci.html#configure-masterless-puppet “Modify /etc/puppet/environments/common.yaml as you need using the parameter documentation described in single_node_ci.pp or logserver.pp. These are the top level puppet class that

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] binary package install - plan of attack

On 05/09/2016 11:11 AM, Robert Collins wrote: > [...] > Testing only dependencies should be in the test profile. > > We may want to have a source or similar named profile for > building-from-source of things, but I'd start with just the default > profile for the always-needed deps and test for CI

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] binary package install - plan of attack

On 2016-05-09 19:47, Robert Collins wrote: > > On 9 May 2016 9:20 PM, "Andreas Jaeger" > wrote: > >> >> And then invoke "bindep test" and that would install both packages, > correct? > > Yes. Great! Thanks for the explanations! I've created some patches

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Tools for tracking the Scientific WG

Hi! Some notes on the interface (hopefully we should have a nice tutorial eventually): On 10/05/16 09:02, Stig Telfer wrote: On 10 May 2016, at 01:00, Blair Bethwaite wrote: Hi Jeremy, On 10 May 2016 at 03:25, Jeremy Stanley wrote: Worth

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party][openstack][CI] Examples required for "single_node_ci_data.yaml" config file

Thanks a lot for the help Bob :) On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Bob Ball wrote: > You need your own credentials where I put - I just didn’t want > to share my credentials with the whole OpenStack community J > > > > Bob > > > > *From:* Abhishek Shrivastava

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party][openstack][CI] Examples required for "single_node_ci_data.yaml" config file

You need your own credentials where I put - I just didn’t want to share my credentials with the whole OpenStack community ☺ Bob From: Abhishek Shrivastava [mailto:abhis...@cloudbyte.com] Sent: 10 May 2016 10:04 To: Bob Ball Cc: openstack-infra@lists.openstack.org;

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party][openstack][CI] Examples required for "single_node_ci_data.yaml" config file

Thanks Bob, So just need to put the following in the section without any credentials? On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Bob Ball wrote: > Hi Abishek, > > > > I use the following which works well: > > oscc_file_contents: | > > # Do Not Edit - Generated &

[OpenStack-Infra] [third-party][openstack][CI] Examples required for "single_node_ci_data.yaml" config file

Hi Folks, I have been configuring the new OpenStack CI and was not able to figure out what exactly needed to be put in the section "*oscc_file_contents:*". So, if anyone has done the configuration and is running the new OpenStack CI please let me know what to put in the configuration. Also, need