Hi Everyone,
I'd like to keep the momentum of JJB 2.0 work going as we're so close to
the finish line. This Friday we're going to continue our sprint in
#openstack-sprint for those who can make it. Wayne suggested we send a
status to the mailing list for those who can't.
To summarize some of the
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 10:56:38AM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Our scheduling system currently only supports biweekly or weekly
> meetings. We don't currently support monthly or triweekly meetings
> (mostly to avoid having to detect complex conflicts with biweekly meetings).
>
> I guess we cou
On 2016-11-09 19:53:27 + (+), Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2016-11-09 18:11:39 + (+), Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> > On 2016-11-08 19:12:32 +0800 (+0800), Tom Fifield wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Upstream apparently revamped the spam system in the version marked
> > > to upgrade to in:
> > > htt
Hi,
I like the ISO week numbers better. I think it’s more consistent, gives a
regular cadence and does not cause confusions with having a meeting on the 5th
week or not for instance.
My 2 cents.
Thanks and Best Regards,
Ildikó
> On 2016. Nov 9., at 20:21, Ian Y. Choi wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
On 2016-11-09 18:11:39 + (+), Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2016-11-08 19:12:32 +0800 (+0800), Tom Fifield wrote:
> [...]
> > Upstream apparently revamped the spam system in the version marked
> > to upgrade to in:
> > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/274032/
>
> I've gone ahead and approved
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016, at 10:33 AM, Jerry Zhao wrote:
> Hi Infra team:
>
> Please add the following member to networking-fortinet-release group.
>
> Jerry Zhao: xyzje...@gmail.com
>
> Jun Li: j...@fortinet.com
Just following up from our quick conversation on IRC so others know this
was done. This
Hello,
IMO if there is an IRC meeting on every week with alternating times for
odd and even weeks,
having two bi-weekly schedules with alternating times would be
self-explanatory.
However, if the meeting frequency would be just one or two in a month,
then referring such as n-th week in every m
Hi Infra team:
Please add the following member to networking-fortinet-release group.
Jerry Zhao: xyzje...@gmail.com
Jun Li: j...@fortinet.com
Thanks!
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cg
On 2016-11-08 19:12:32 +0800 (+0800), Tom Fifield wrote:
[...]
> Upstream apparently revamped the spam system in the version marked
> to upgrade to in:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/274032/
I've gone ahead and approved this just now... I was unaware it was
out there waiting for approval. Sorr
Hello,
I18n team currently uses Zanata in translate.openstack.org so frequently
as an OpenStack translation platform.
I really appreciate great help from all contributors, especially infra
team members and Zanata development team
:
http://specs.openstack.org/openstack-infra/infra-specs/specs/m
Stig Telfer wrote:
> In the Scientific WG we now have 3 co-chairs - one in Australia, one in the
> USA and one in the UK. We are interested in arranging IRC meetings in 3 time
> zones, ie tri-weekly time slots. Is that achievable?
>
> One potential issue I can see is that scheduling a tri-week
Hi All -
In the Scientific WG we now have 3 co-chairs - one in Australia, one in the USA
and one in the UK. We are interested in arranging IRC meetings in 3 time
zones, ie tri-weekly time slots. Is that achievable?
One potential issue I can see is that scheduling a tri-weekly slot would
con
12 matches
Mail list logo