Re: [OpenStack-Infra] About aarch64 third party CI

2017-06-09 22:18 GMT+02:00 Paul Belanger : > On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 07:58:44PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > On 2017-06-07 14:26:10 +0800 (+0800), Xinliang Liu wrote: > > [...] > > > we already have our own pre-built debian cloud image, could I just > > > use it and not use the one built by di

[OpenStack-Infra] Opendayight Internship (Jenkins job builder) Week 2 status update June 5th-June 11th 2017

Hi, This past week I have done the following: - Update GitLab Plugin to use convert_mapping_to_xml[1] - Update artifactory_repository function to use convert_mapping_to_xml[2] - Update artifactory_common_details function to use convert_mapping_to_xml[3] - Update shell and python plugins to use co

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] About aarch64 third party CI

Ricardo Carrillo Cruz writes: > This is a nodepool.yaml that can help you get going: > > http://paste.openstack.org/show/612191/ Glad it worked! You can drop 'zmq-publishers' from the config entirely. If 'images-dir' and 'diskimages' are required, then I would consider that a bug; we should ha

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] On the subject of HTTP interfaces and Zuul

Clint Byrum writes: > Excerpts from corvus's message of 2017-06-09 13:11:00 -0700: >> Clark Boylan writes: >> >> > I'm wary of this simply because it looks a lot like repeating >> > OpenStack's (now failed) decision to stick web servers in a bunch of >> > python processes then do cooperative mu

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] About aarch64 third party CI

Hi Jeremy, Thanks for reply;-) On 10 June 2017 at 03:58, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-06-07 14:26:10 +0800 (+0800), Xinliang Liu wrote: > [...] > > we already have our own pre-built debian cloud image, could I just > > use it and not use the one built by diskimage-builder? > [...] > > The sho

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] About aarch64 third party CI

On 13 June 2017 at 01:00, Ricardo Carrillo Cruz < ricardo.carrillo.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2017-06-09 22:18 GMT+02:00 Paul Belanger : > >> On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 07:58:44PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: >> > On 2017-06-07 14:26:10 +0800 (+0800), Xinliang Liu wrote: >> > [...] >> > > we alread

[OpenStack-Infra] [infra] confusion on projec/jobs between zuul and jenkins job builder

Hi, I got a confusion on zuul and jenkins job builder. I see that both zuul and jenkins job builder describe projects/jobs in their ymal conf files. Then what's the difference? How these two kinds projects/jobs work together? Best, -xinliang ___ OpenStac

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [infra] confusion on projec/jobs between zuul and jenkins job builder

Hi Xinliang, Can you provide more details? If you can share the files in [1] In general JJB yaml files are translated into Jenkins Jobs And zuul yaml ( layout.yaml ) is used by zuul to trigger a specific job according to the patchset [1] paste.openstack.org Best Regards Lenny From: Xinliang Liu