Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Setting the bar higher for stackforge

2014-09-15 Thread Sandy Walsh
From: Jeremy Stanley [fu...@yuggoth.org] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 1:06 PM On 2014-09-15 14:36:59 + (+), Sandy Walsh wrote: For our group, the greatest value of StackForge is CLA management. [...] Out of curiosity, why is that a value to your StackForge project(s)? About the only

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Setting the bar higher for stackforge

2014-09-15 Thread Sandy Walsh
From: Jeremy Stanley [fu...@yuggoth.org] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 2:05 PM On 2014-09-15 16:47:13 + (+), Sandy Walsh wrote: It's the Corporate CLA that's needed. The companies that want to contribute have already vetted and signed the CCLA

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Setting the bar higher for stackforge

2014-09-15 Thread Sandy Walsh
From: Jeremy Stanley [fu...@yuggoth.org] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 2:51 PM On 2014-09-15 17:25:48 + (+), Sandy Walsh wrote: Hmm, my understanding was that branches are not accepted without a signed ICLA. Is that not the default case