Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Future JJB development

2015-07-06 Thread Thanh Ha
Thanks for posting this. My concern as a consumer of JJB is that reviewers will lose interest in reviewing JJB patches and move on if JJB is no longer a necessary component of OpenStack CI (I feel like we are already seeing this today). A plan is needed to ensure that there are and will continue to

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Future JJB development

2015-07-06 Thread Darragh Bailey
Hi, Bit slow in catching up with email On 30 June 2015 at 16:44, Wayne Warren wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:00 AM, James E. Blair > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Jenkins Job builder is one of our more widely used projects. It has > > served us extremely well and a lot of other projects have fo

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Future JJB development

2015-06-30 Thread Wayne Warren
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:00 AM, James E. Blair wrote: > Hi, > > Jenkins Job builder is one of our more widely used projects. It has > served us extremely well and a lot of other projects have found it to be > very useful. Many of us are delighted and very proud of this. > > Recently I have pro

[OpenStack-Infra] Future JJB development

2015-06-29 Thread James E. Blair
Hi, Jenkins Job builder is one of our more widely used projects. It has served us extremely well and a lot of other projects have found it to be very useful. Many of us are delighted and very proud of this. Recently I have proposed substantial changes to Zuul that I hope will, through the proce