On 02/21/2014 03:42 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Joe Gordon wrote:
>>> The move to stackforge would make sense if it was developed by a nascent
>>> separate group, but I don't think that's the case here ?
>>
>> I think this is the case, currently the core group on gantt is
>> nova-core and Robert Co
Joe Gordon wrote:
>> The move to stackforge would make sense if it was developed by a nascent
>> separate group, but I don't think that's the case here ?
>
> I think this is the case, currently the core group on gantt is
> nova-core and Robert Collins, while the main commiter is Donald Dugger
> (w
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:58 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Russell Bryant wrote:
>> The gantt repository was originally put under openstack/. I would like
>> to move gantt to stackforge to better reflect the current status of the
>> project.
>>
>> We don't actually expect anyone to use gantt as-is.
On 02/19/2014 05:58 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Russell Bryant wrote:
>> The gantt repository was originally put under openstack/. I would like
>> to move gantt to stackforge to better reflect the current status of the
>> project.
>>
>> We don't actually expect anyone to use gantt as-is. The cons
Russell Bryant wrote:
> The gantt repository was originally put under openstack/. I would like
> to move gantt to stackforge to better reflect the current status of the
> project.
>
> We don't actually expect anyone to use gantt as-is. The consensus seems
> to be that we have quite a bit of work
Greetings,
The gantt repository was originally put under openstack/. I would like
to move gantt to stackforge to better reflect the current status of the
project.
We don't actually expect anyone to use gantt as-is. The consensus seems
to be that we have quite a bit of work left to do inside of
