On 2016-05-24 13:50:42 + (+), Jeremy Stanley wrote:
[...]
> we have a bunch of hostname==service/vhost assumptions baked into
> our configuration management right now. While I'm not opposed to
> the plan in principle, executing it implies a pretty significant
> cleanup effort to stop using
Spencer Krum writes:
>> Though I've since been thinking (and a quick codesearch[*] confirms
>> it) that we have a bunch of hostname==service/vhost assumptions
>> baked into our configuration management right now. While I'm not
>> opposed to the plan in principle, executing it implies a pretty
>>
On 2016-05-24 10:21:43 -0700 (-0700), Spencer Krum wrote:
> At the summit Clark pointed out that many of our vhost templates could
> be simplified to listen on *. I think this works for http, not sure
> about https.
[...]
Yeah, I had to do it recently for the storyboard servers, since it
appears t
> Though I've since been thinking (and a quick codesearch[*] confirms
> it) that we have a bunch of hostname==service/vhost assumptions
> baked into our configuration management right now. While I'm not
> opposed to the plan in principle, executing it implies a pretty
> significant cleanup effort
On 2016-05-23 20:38:55 + (+), Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> As discussed during the "Launch Node, Ansible and Puppet" summit
> session in Austin[1], we're making things unnecessarily hard on
> ourselves by insisting on having multiple servers in our inventory
> with the same name. In order to mak
2016-05-23 22:38 GMT+02:00 Jeremy Stanley :
> As discussed during the "Launch Node, Ansible and Puppet" summit
> session in Austin[1], we're making things unnecessarily hard on
> ourselves by insisting on having multiple servers in our inventory
> with the same name. In order to make server additi
Jeremy Stanley writes:
> We do already have some servers with numbered suffixes but I don't
> think this plan changes how we deal with them. When creating a new
> server for a pool like that, just use the lowest available unused
> number. Here's a relevant historical example:
...
Yes, I think i
As discussed during the "Launch Node, Ansible and Puppet" summit
session in Austin[1], we're making things unnecessarily hard on
ourselves by insisting on having multiple servers in our inventory
with the same name. In order to make server addition and replacement
automation simpler, lets start usi
