Jeremy, et. Al.,
User works, all is well.
Thanks!
Robert
Sent from a device
> On Nov 5, 2013, at 11:36 AM, "Robert Starmer (starmer)"
> wrote:
>
> Ok, so it does appear that cisco_infra is dead and can be removed.
>
> I'll try the other account now, and let you know, thanks!
>
> Robert
>
Ok, so it does appear that cisco_infra is dead and can be removed.
I'll try the other account now, and let you know, thanks!
Robert
Sent from a device
> On Nov 5, 2013, at 11:31 AM, "Jeremy Stanley" wrote:
>
>> On 2013-10-31 17:40:31 + (+), Robert Starmer (starmer) wrote:
>> I haven't
On 2013-10-31 17:40:31 + (+), Robert Starmer (starmer) wrote:
> I haven't found anyone who claims ownership to the cisco_infra
> account.
I have a lead for you... according to my IRC client logs,
dendrobates (Rick Clark) requested it back in March of this year.
Hope that helps track it dow
I think it comes down to us getting a resource looking at the BMaaS space to
enable that path. I.e., I think we're on it, just trying to bring up enough
resource to be able to _contribute_ to it :)
R
On Oct 31, 2013, at 10:55 AM, Robert Collins
wrote:
> On 31 October 2013 18:35, Robert Star
On 31 October 2013 18:35, Robert Starmer (starmer) wrote:
> Russell,
>
> We're planning on testing our Neutron plugins and the stackforge puppetry
> (where we've had some level of contribution). We also have the
> openstack-installer project which is being built in conjunction with Dan
> Bode,
Jeremy,
I haven't found anyone who claims ownership to the cisco_infra account. Can we
set up the cisco-openstack-ci user, and at least until I can confirm 100% that
there's nothing using the other address, leave the cisco_infra user around?
Can we also change the cisco_infra user e-mail to
Russell,
We're planning on testing our Neutron plugins and the stackforge puppetry
(where we've had some level of contribution). We also have the
openstack-installer project which is being built in conjunction with Dan Bode,
which is being pushed up to stackforge as well, leveraging a data mod
That's a very good question, and one that I'll have to go dig into. I'm not
actually sure who owns that (though I do know that we'd regardless want to
change the mail alias it targets, as that one will bounce). I'll see if I can
get an answer in the am. If you wouldn't mind enabling the cisco-o
On 2013-10-30 17:06:08 + (+), Robert Starmer (starmer) wrote:
[...]
> cisco-openstack-ci
> Cisco OpenStack CI Robot
> cisco-openstack...@external.cisco.com
[...]
I'm perfectly happy to add this, but out of curiosity how does this
differ from the cisco_infra (openstack-core-t...@cisco.com)
On 10/30/2013 01:06 PM, Robert Starmer (starmer) wrote:
> User Name
> —
> cisco-openstack-ci
> —
>
> Full Name
> —
> Cisco OpenStack CI Robot
> —
Cool. I love seeing more CI come on-line. Can you share some more
information about what you are testing? What's the test environment and
what patch
10 matches
Mail list logo
