Hi Kazu and Matt,
Thanks for the pointers. I think the discussion around pacemaker and
pacemaker remote seems most promising, esp with Russel's blog post I found
after I emailed earlier [1].
Not sure how tooling would be different, but pacemaker, given its use in
the controller cluster anyways,
I believe that either have your customers design their apps to handle
failures or have tools that are reactive to failures.
Unfortunately like many other private cloud operators we deal a lot with
legacy applications that aren't scaled horizontally or fault tolerant and
so we've built tooling to
I also support the idea of having 2 VIPs. The external one can handle all the
untrusted traffic and the internal one the trusted one. So, you don’t need to
enable SSL on all the internal traffic and then we speed up the control plane.
Edgar
From: Robert Starmer
Hello all,
I've just started to add some content for this afternoon session on the
etherpad:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/MAN-ops-Upgrade-patches-packaging.
This is just a collection of various ideas from the top of my head
while drinking the morning coffee :)
Feel free to add
