Re: [Openstack-operators] [User-committee] [scientific][scientific-wg] Reminder: IRC meeting Wednesday 0900

Sub-etherpad for Scientific-specific brainstorming: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BOS-UC-brainstorming-scientific-wg On 1 March 2017 at 05:02, Stig Telfer wrote: > Greetings all - > > We have a Scientific WG IRC meeting on Wednesday at 0900 UTC in channel >

[Openstack-operators] Ansible OpenStack dnsmasq errors in syslog

In the process of diagnosing an Ansible OpenStack multi-node build problem, I came across the following dnsmasq-dhcp errors in syslog. —— snip —— Feb 28 20:25:06 xh3 dnsmasq-dhcp[1956]: not giving name aio1-designate-container-f182826f to the DHCP lease of 10.255.255.226 because the name

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack] Unable to launch an instance

You should look at the compute node and the scheduler for actual error logs as said below. But one things I see is that you are using qcow2 images, but have disk in your flavor set to zero. Seems like the problem is that your image is larger than the virtual disk that you are creating via

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack] Unable to launch an instance

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Amit Kumar wrote: > Hi All, > > I have installed Openstack Newton using Openstack-Ansible. While creating an > instance, it is failing with following error: > > MessageNo valid host was found. There are not enough hosts The "not enough hosts"

[Openstack-operators] [scientific][scientific-wg] Reminder: IRC meeting Wednesday 0900

Greetings all - We have a Scientific WG IRC meeting on Wednesday at 0900 UTC in channel #openstack-meeting. Everyone is welcome. The agenda[1] is a simple one - brainstorming for Scientific WG input to the Forum at Boston. Best wishes, Stig [1]

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack] Unable to launch an instance

The last time I saw this error, my neutron agent on the compute host wasn't running. If you run: neutron agent-listis the neutron agent on your compute node up and running? On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Amit Kumar wrote: > Hi All, > > I have installed Openstack

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Foundation Board] User Survey update

Heidi, In behalf of the UC and the User Community I would like to Thank You for the terrific amount of work invested on the User Survey. We all are looking forward to analyze the results and come up with action items after that for all of us, Board, TC and UC. Please, keep surprising us with

[Openstack-operators] [openstack] Unable to launch an instance

Hi All, I have installed Openstack Newton using Openstack-Ansible. While creating an instance, it is failing with following error: *Message**No valid host was found. There are not enough hosts available.* *Code**500**Details**File

[Openstack-operators] User Survey update

So far, we have nearly 1,400 surveys and more than 550 deployments—that’s 40% more than our largest survey ever! As promised, we shared the PTL-submitted questions data that came in by Feb. 20 with PTLs prior to the Project Teams Gathering in Atlanta, to inform their conversations. We also

Re: [Openstack-operators] status of encrypted volumes in RBDDriver (Cinder)

Hi Evan, AFAIK Cinder doesn't support this and currently LUKS is only supported for LVM volumes. Qemu 2.6 release notes suggests that LUKS encryption is going to be merged into future qemu releases. http://wiki.qemu-project.org/ChangeLog/2.6#Future_incompatible_changes On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at

[Openstack-operators] status of encrypted volumes in RBDDriver (Cinder)

Does anyone have LUKS encrypted volumes running on Ceph RBD? I have not found any recent (2017) updates on whether this is functional. >From what I understand, it was waiting for the release of QEMU 2.6.0 (which is out now). If functional, what major/minor version of cinder is needed? Any

[Openstack-operators] OpenStack Days East Looking for Sponsors & Leads! [2]

Dear OpenStack Sponsors and Supporters, Thanks go to the companies who have shown an interest in sponsoring the upcoming OpenStack Days East 2017 conference. As you may have heard, we are excited to announce that OpenStack Days

Re: [Openstack-operators] osa Mitaka api SSL end points

Hi Andy, Thank you for that, I will get straight onto that and make sure all of the public endpoints are HTTPS. Those are the ones that I care about for obvious reasons. If I get stuck, I will be sure to chat in #openstack-ansible Once again thanks for the speedy reply and help. Grant On

Re: [Openstack-operators] osa Mitaka api SSL end points

On 28 February 2017 at 09:59, Grant Morley wrote: > Hi All, > > We have an OSA Mitaka deployment and for some reason all of the end points > ( keystone, neutron, glance etc.. ) are all reporting as HTTP rather than > HTTPS. The only thing that seems to have worked with

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Large deployments] Neutron issues in Openstack Large deployment using DVR

What do you see in the Neutron server logs while it's not responding? On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 1:27 AM, Satyanarayana Patibandla wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > Thanks for your suggestion. I will modify the parameter value and will test > the changes. > > Could you please

[Openstack-operators] osa Mitaka api SSL end points

Hi All, We have an OSA Mitaka deployment and for some reason all of the end points ( keystone, neutron, glance etc.. ) are all reporting as HTTP rather than HTTPS. The only thing that seems to have worked with HTTPS is Horizon ( I know that isn't an api endpoint, just for clarification). We

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Large deployments] Neutron issues in Openstack Large deployment using DVR

Hi Kevin, Thanks for your suggestion. I will modify the parameter value and will test the changes. Could you please provide your suggestion on recovering to normal state after getting this error. Once we get this error the neutron CLI gives "504 gateway timeout". We tried to restart all

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Large deployments] Neutron issues in Openstack Large deployment using DVR

That particular update query is issued by the agent state report handler. And it looks like they might be falling behind based on the timestamp it's trying to update in the DB (14:46:35) and the log statement (14:50:29). Can you try increasing the rpc_state_report_workers value? If you haven't

[Openstack-operators] [MassivelyDistributed] IRC Meeting tomorrow 15:00 UTC

Dear all, A gentle reminder for our meeting tomorrow. As usual, the agenda is available at: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/massively_distributed_ircmeetings_2017 (line 251) Please feel free to add items. Best, Ad_rien_ ___ OpenStack-operators