Re: [Openstack-operators] Passing a flavor's extra_specs to libvirt

Hello Paco - > On 13 Apr 2017, at 11:10, Paco Bernabé wrote: > > Hi, > > The issue is apparently solved; we found a solution here > https://www.stackhpc.com/tripleo-numa-vcpu-pinning.html where libvirt and > qemu-kvm version restrictions where indicated. The

Re: [Openstack-operators] Ceilometer and disk IO

Thanks for the reply. I have see people recommending to use ceph as a backed for gnocchi but we don't use Ceph yet and looks like gnocchi does not support cinder backends. We use Dell EQ San for block devices. -Paras. On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Alex Hubner wrote: >

[Openstack-operators] OpenStack Summit Boston Prices Increase Tomorrow!

Hi everyone, It’s your last chance to save on your OpenStack Summit Boston tickets before prices increase tomorrow Friday, April 14 at 11:59pm PDT (April 15 at 6:59 UTC). Haven’t booked your hotel yet? You can purchase a Full Access Summit

Re: [Openstack-operators] Passing a flavor's extra_specs to libvirt

Hi, The issue is apparently solved; we found a solution here https://www.stackhpc.com/tripleo-numa-vcpu-pinning.html where libvirt and qemu-kvm version restrictions where indicated. The CentOS7.3 repo has an older qemu-kvm version

[Openstack-operators] openstack newton fwaas

I all, I am trying to configure fwaas on newton. I suppose there are some errors in nwtorking guide: Enable FWaaS v2¶ - Enable the FWaaS plug-in in the /etc/neutron/neutron.conf file: service_plugins =

Re: [Openstack-operators] Passing a flavor's extra_specs to libvirt

Hi, More info; in de log file of the nova-scheduler we see messages like ( is de compute host name): , fails NUMA topology requirements. No host NUMA topology while the instance specified one. host_passes /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nova/scheduler/filters/numa_topology_filter.py:100

Re: [Openstack-operators] Boston Forum Schedule Online

Tim Bell wrote: > Yes, I agree it is difficult… I was asking as there was an option ‘watch > later’ on the summit schedule for the fishbowl sessions. > > The option should probably be removed from the summit schedule web page so > people don’t get disappointed later if that is not too

Re: [Openstack-operators] Boston Forum Schedule Online

Yes, I agree it is difficult… I was asking as there was an option ‘watch later’ on the summit schedule for the fishbowl sessions. The option should probably be removed from the summit schedule web page so people don’t get disappointed later if that is not too complicated. Tim On 13.04.17,

Re: [Openstack-operators] Boston Forum Schedule Online

Tim Bell wrote: > Do you know if the Forum sessions will be video’d? As far as I know they won't (same as old Design/Ops summit sessions). It's difficult to produce, with people all over the room and not necessarily using microphones. The idea is to have the moderator post a follow-up thread for

[Openstack-operators] Openstack Heat https links problems upgrading to Newton

Hello ops, if anyone is interested I have problems with Heat and the Newton upgrade. I sent an email about this here: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-April/115412.html If anyone already faced this issue any help would be appreciated ! thank you Saverio

[Openstack-operators] Passing a flavor's extra_specs to libvirt

Hi, After reading the following articles: https://docs.openstack.org/admin-guide/compute-flavors.html http://redhatstackblog.redhat.com/2015/05/05/cpu-pinning-and-numa-topology-awareness-in-openstack-compute/

Re: [Openstack-operators] Boston Forum Schedule Online

Tom, Do you know if the Forum sessions will be video’d? Tim On 13.04.17, 05:52, "Tom Fifield" wrote: Hello all, The schedule for our the Forum is online: https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/summit-schedule/#track=146 ==> Session