With the network down, does ovs-vsctl show that it is connected to the
controller?
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Gustavo Randich
wrote:
> Exactly, we access via a tagged interface, which is part of br-ex
>
> # ip a show vlan171
> 16: vlan171:
On 4/28/2017 11:19 AM, Eric Fried wrote:
If it's *just* glance we're making an exception for, I prefer #1 (don't
deprecate/remove [glance]api_servers). It's way less code &
infrastructure, and it discourages others from jumping on the
multiple-endpoints bandwagon. If we provide
If it's *just* glance we're making an exception for, I prefer #1 (don't
deprecate/remove [glance]api_servers). It's way less code &
infrastructure, and it discourages others from jumping on the
multiple-endpoints bandwagon. If we provide endpoint_override_list
(handwave), people will think it's
Hi All,
I’m reaching out to you to draw your attention to a Forum topic we proposed
with Alex (OpenStack Manuals PTL):
https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/summit-schedule/events/18939/openstack-documentation-the-future-depends-on-all-of-us
Hi Kevin, we are using the default listen address of loopback interface:
# grep -r of_listen_address /etc/neutron
/etc/neutron/plugins/ml2/openvswitch_agent.ini:#of_listen_address =
127.0.0.1
tcp/127.0.0.1:6640 -> ovsdb-server /etc/openvswitch/conf.db
-vconsole:emer -vsyslog:err
Maybe we are talking about two different things here? I’m a bit confused.
Our Glance config in nova.conf on HV’s looks like this:
[glance]
api_servers=http://glance1:9292,http://glance2:9292,http://glance3:9292,http://glance4:9292
glance_api_insecure=True
glance_num_retries=4
I can moderate HA session if you want (although there is one listed in
schedule?). Feel free to sign me up
On 28 April 2017 at 06:07, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 04/28/2017 08:22 AM, Shamail Tahir wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Most of the proposed/accepted Forum sessions
Ok. That would solve some of the problem for us, but we’d still be losing the
redundancy. We could do some HAProxy tricks to route around downed services,
but it wouldn’t handle the case when that one physical box is down.
Is there some downside to allowing endpoint_override to remain a list?
On 4/28/2017 9:05 AM, Eric Fried wrote:
Blair, Mike-
There will be an endpoint_override that will bypass the service
catalog. It still only takes one URL, though.
Thanks,
Eric (efried)
Eric,
I think the answer we're getting from
Blair, Mike-
There will be an endpoint_override that will bypass the service
catalog. It still only takes one URL, though.
Thanks,
Eric (efried)
On 04/27/2017 11:50 PM, Blair Bethwaite wrote:
> We at Nectar are in the same boat as Mike.
Thanks Stig,
I added a presentation to the schedule.
Cheers,
George
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Stig Telfer
wrote:
> Hi George -
>
> Sorry for the slow response. The consensus was for 8 minutes maximum.
> That should be plenty for a lightning talk, and
On 04/28/2017 08:22 AM, Shamail Tahir wrote:
Hi everyone,
Most of the proposed/accepted Forum sessions currently have moderators
but there are six sessions that do not have a confirmed moderator yet.
Please look at the list below and let us know if you would be willing to
help moderate any of
Hi everyone,
Most of the proposed/accepted Forum sessions currently have moderators but
there are six sessions that do not have a confirmed moderator yet. Please
look at the list below and let us know if you would be willing to help
moderate any of these sessions.
The topics look really
On 04/28/2017 12:50 AM, Blair Bethwaite wrote:
> We at Nectar are in the same boat as Mike. Our use-case is a little
> bit more about geo-distributed operations though - our Cells are in
> different States around the country, so the local glance-apis are
> particularly important for caching
Are you using an of_listen_address value of an interface being brought
down?
On Apr 25, 2017 17:34, "Gustavo Randich" wrote:
> (using Mitaka / Ubuntu 16 / Neutron DVR / OVS / VXLAN / l2_population)
>
> This sounds very strange (to me): recently, after a switch outage,
15 matches
Mail list logo