Re: [Openstack-operators] [packaging][ubuntu] nova-api + nova-placement-api package conflict

2017-06-26 Thread Chris Apsey
James, Bug report submitted. Thanks! Chris --- v/r Chris Apsey bitskr...@bitskrieg.net https://www.bitskrieg.net On 2017-06-26 09:28, James Page wrote: Tweaking subject line a bit... On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 at 02:27 Chris Apsey wrote: All, Doing some testing prior to moving to Ocata from N

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Turning TC/UC workgroups into OpenStack SIGs

2017-06-26 Thread Melvin Hillsman
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 6/21/2017 11:17 AM, Shamail Tahir wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Thierry Carrez > > wrote: >> >> Shamail Tahir wrote: >> > In the past, governance has helped (on the UC WG side)

Re: [Openstack-operators] Leveraging Gnocchi in Mitaka

2017-06-26 Thread Tracy Comstock Roesler
Hi Gordon, If I understand what you¹re saying, you think I can try direct://?publisher=gnocchi in the pipeline.yaml on the controller nodes, but not the compute nodes to bypass the collector? When I attempted to do so I received an error (full stack trace ommitted): 2017-06-26 14:52:51.625 41444

[Openstack-operators] OpenStack User Survey Now Open

2017-06-26 Thread Allison Price
Hi everyone, If you’re running OpenStack, please participate in the OpenStack User Survey . If you have already completed the survey before, you can simply login to update your deployment details. Please note that if your survey response has not been updat

Re: [Openstack-operators] [packaging][ubuntu] nova-api + nova-placement-api package conflict

2017-06-26 Thread James Page
Tweaking subject line a bit... On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 at 02:27 Chris Apsey wrote: > All, > > Doing some testing prior to moving to Ocata from Newton, and I ran into > this issue when trying to get the nova placement api set up: > > == > Package: nova-placement-ap

Re: [Openstack-operators] Leveraging Gnocchi in Mitaka

2017-06-26 Thread gordon chung
On 24/06/17 10:49 PM, Mike Smith wrote: > We use ceilometer-compute and we would like to have it push metrics directly > to Gnocchi, bypassing the rabbit queues that ceilometer uses in the default > Mitaka configuration. Currently our ceilometer-compute pushes to the > notification queue, whi