Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops Meetup, Co-Location options, and User Feedback

Thanks to everyone that weighed in! We'll be working on some updated language around the event to clarify the inclusion of the Ops community. We'll plan to float that to both operators and dev lists when we're a little further along. Meantime, if you have any questions or concerns, don't

Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops Meetup, Co-Location options, and User Feedback

Looks like we can move forward with co-location!. Jimmy, let us know when we need to work time in for you or other Foundation folks to discuss more details in the UC meeting and/or Ops Meetup Team meetings. Thanks! VW On 4/3/18, 3:49 AM, "Shintaro Mizuno"

Re: [Openstack-operators] nova-placement-api tuning

On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 4:48 AM, Chris Dent wrote: > On Mon, 2 Apr 2018, Alex Schultz wrote: > >> So this is/was valid. A few years back there was some perf tests done >> with various combinations of process/threads and for Keystone it was >> determined that threads should

Re: [Openstack-operators] nova-placement-api tuning

On 04/03/2018 06:48 AM, Chris Dent wrote: On Mon, 2 Apr 2018, Alex Schultz wrote: So this is/was valid. A few years back there was some perf tests done with various combinations of process/threads and for Keystone it was determined that threads should be 1 while you should adjust the process

Re: [Openstack-operators] nova-placement-api tuning

On Mon, 2 Apr 2018, Alex Schultz wrote: So this is/was valid. A few years back there was some perf tests done with various combinations of process/threads and for Keystone it was determined that threads should be 1 while you should adjust the process count (hence the bug). Now I guess the

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] RFC: Next minimum libvirt / QEMU versions for "Solar" release

Hey, On 30.03.2018 16:26, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: [...] Taking the DistroSupportMatrix into picture, for the sake of discussion, how about the following NEXT_MIN versions for "Solar" release: (a) libvirt: 3.2.0 (released on 23-Feb-2017) [...] (b) QEMU: 2.9.0 (released on 20-Apr-2017)

Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops Meetup, Co-Location options, and User Feedback

I'm also +1 on this. I've circulated to the Japanese Ops group and heard no objection so would be more +1s from our community. Shintaro -- Shintaro MIZUNO (水野伸太郎) NTT Software Innovation Center TEL: 0422-59-4977 E-mail: mizuno.shint...@lab.ntt.co.jp

Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops Meetup, Co-Location options, and User Feedback

Erik McCormick wrote: > I'm a +1 too as long as the devs at large are cool with it and won't > hate on us for crashing their party. As a data point, in a recent survey 89% of surveyed developers supported that the Ops meetup should happen at the same time and place. Amongst past PTG attendees,