Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [all] Consistent policy names

2018-09-14 Thread Lance Bragstad
Ok - yeah, I'm not sure what the history behind that is either... I'm mainly curious if that's something we can/should keep or if we are opposed to dropping 'os' and 'api' from the convention (e.g. load-balancer:loadbalancer:post as opposed to os_load-balancer_api:loadbalancer:post) and just

[Openstack-operators] [tc][uc]Community Wide Long Term Goals

2018-09-14 Thread Zhipeng Huang
Hi, Based upon the discussion we had at the TC session in the afternoon, I'm starting to draft a patch to add long term goal mechanism into governance. It is by no means a complete solution at the moment (still have not thought through the execution method yet to make sure the outcome), but feel

[Openstack-operators] [nova][publiccloud-wg] Proposal to shelve on stop/suspend

2018-09-14 Thread Matt Riedemann
tl;dr: I'm proposing a new parameter to the server stop (and suspend?) APIs to control if nova shelve offloads the server. Long form: This came up during the public cloud WG session this week based on a couple of feature requests [1][2]. When a user stops/suspends a server, the hypervisor

[Openstack-operators] [Openstack-sigs][openstack-dev][all]Expose SIGs/WGs as single window for Users/Ops scenario

2018-09-14 Thread Rico Lin
The Idea has been raising around (from me or from Matt's ML), so I would like to give people more update on this (in terms of what I have been raising, what people have been feedbacks, and what init idea I can collect or I have as actions. *Why are we doing this?* The basic concept for this

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [all] Consistent policy names

2018-09-14 Thread Michael Johnson
I don't know for sure, but I assume it is short for "OpenStack" and prefixing OpenStack policies vs. third party plugin policies for documentation purposes. I am guilty of borrowing this from existing code examples[0]. [0]

[Openstack-operators] [tc]Global Reachout Proposal

2018-09-14 Thread Zhipeng Huang
Hi all, Follow up the diversity discussion we had in the tc session this morning [0], I've proposed a resolution on facilitating technical community in large to engage in global reachout for OpenStack more efficiently. Your feedbacks are welcomed. Whether this should be a new resolution or not

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [nova] Hard fail if you try to rename an AZ with instances in it?

2018-09-14 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 3/28/2018 4:35 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: On 03/28/2018 03:35 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 3/27/2018 10:37 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: If we want to actually fix the issue once and for all, we need to make availability zones a real thing that has a permanent identifier (UUID) and store that permanent

[Openstack-operators] [TripleO] undercloud sshd config override

2018-09-14 Thread Cody
Hello folks, I installed TripleO undercloud on a machine with a pre-existing sshd_config that disabled root and password login. The file was rewritten by Puppet after the undercloud installation and was made to allow for both options. This is not a good default practice. Is there a way to set the

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [all] Consistent policy names

2018-09-14 Thread Lance Bragstad
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 5:46 PM Michael Johnson wrote: > In Octavia I selected[0] "os_load-balancer_api:loadbalancer:post" > which maps to the "os--api::" format. > Thanks for explaining the justification, Michael. I'm curious if anyone has context on the "os-" part of the format? I've seen