Re: [Openstack-operators] new SIGs to cover use cases

Good point. Adding SIG list. -Original Message- From: Jeremy Stanley [mailto:fu...@yuggoth.org] Sent: Monday, November 12, 2018 4:46 PM To: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] new SIGs to cover use cases [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Please report any

[Openstack-operators] new SIGs to cover use cases

Team, At today Board and joint TC and UC meetings 2 questions come up: 1. Do we have or want to create a user community around Hybrid cloud. This is one of the major push of OpenStack for the communities. With 70+% of questionnaire responders told that they deploy and use hybrid cloud. We do

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [goals][tc][ptl][uc] starting goal selection for T series

+1 -Original Message- From: Tim Bell [mailto:tim.b...@cern.ch] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 1:56 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); openstack-operators; openstack-sigs Subject: Re: [Openstack-sigs] [openstack-dev] [goals][tc][ptl][uc] starting

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] The Forum Schedule is now live

LOL From: Jimmy McArthur [mailto:ji...@openstack.org] Sent: Monday, April 30, 2018 1:22 PM To: Kanevsky, Arkady Cc: a...@demarco.com; openstack-...@lists.openstack.org; OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] The Forum Schedule is now live We

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] The Forum Schedule is now live

Both are currently empty. From: Jimmy McArthur [mailto:ji...@openstack.org] Sent: Monday, April 30, 2018 10:48 AM To: Amy Marrich Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] The Forum

Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops Meetup, Co-Location options, and User Feedback

+1 From: Erik McCormick [mailto:emccorm...@cirrusseven.com] Sent: Monday, April 2, 2018 3:57 PM To: Melvin Hillsman Cc: openstack-operators Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops Meetup, Co-Location options, and User Feedback I'm

Re: [Openstack-operators] [User-committee] User Committee Election Results - February 2018

Congrats to new committee members. And thanks for great job for previous ones. From: Shilla Saebi [mailto:shilla.sa...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2018 5:52 PM To: user-committee ; OpenStack Mailing List ; OpenStack

Re: [Openstack-operators] User Committee Elections

I saw election email with the pointer to votes. See no reason for stopping it now. But extending vote for 1 more week makes sense. Thanks, Arkady From: Melvin Hillsman [mailto:mrhills...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 11:32 AM To: user-committee ;

Re: [Openstack-operators] [User-committee] Stepping aside announcement

Edgar, thank you for all your hard work and passion. From: Melvin Hillsman [mailto:mrhills...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 12:45 PM To: Amy Marrich Cc: openst...@lists.openstack.org; openstack-operators ; user-committee

Re: [Openstack-operators] Openstack operational configuration improvement.

Flint, I do support UI method for solution management. My point is that it is not Horizon one as it is on a different layer. From: Flint WALRUS [mailto:gael.ther...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, December 18, 2017 9:40 AM To: Kanevsky, Arkady Cc:

Re: [Openstack-operators] thierry's longer dev cycle proposal

It is a sign of the maturity of OpenStack. With lots of deployment and most of them in production, the emphasis is shifting from rapid functionality additions to stability, manageability, and long term operability. -Original Message- From: Melvin Hillsman [mailto:mrhills...@gmail.com]

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [skip-level-upgrades][fast-forward-upgrades] PTG summary

See you there Eric. From: Erik McCormick [mailto:emccorm...@cirrusseven.com] Sent: Monday, October 30, 2017 10:58 AM To: Matt Riedemann Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List ; openstack-operators

[Openstack-operators] https://www.openstack.org/marketplace/ web changes

Danny and team, What is the process of updating the web page template for detailed "distro" information to align with updated project-navigator. For example, to add AODH, PANKO, Tempest, Rally as projects for distro solution offering? Just looking for a process of requesting/making changes to

Re: [Openstack-operators] It's time...

Tom, Thank you for everything. Arkady From: Rico Lin [mailto:rico.lin.gua...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2017 9:45 AM To: Tom Fifield Cc: OpenStack Operators Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] It's time... Tom, It's my

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [skip-level-upgrades][fast-forward-upgrades] PTG summary

There are some loose ends that Saverio correctly bringing up. These perfect points to discuss at Forum. Suggest we start etherpad to collect agenda for it. -Original Message- From: Lee Yarwood [mailto:lyarw...@redhat.com] Sent: Friday, September 29, 2017 7:04 AM To: Saverio Proto

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [skip-level-upgrades][fast-forward-upgrades] PTG summary

Erik, Thanks for setting up a session for it. Glad it is driven by Operators. I will be happy to work with you on the session and run it with you. Thanks, Arkady From: Erik McCormick [mailto:emccorm...@cirrusseven.com] Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 7:40 AM To: Lee Yarwood

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [skip-level-upgrades][fast-forward-upgrades] PTG summary

Lee, I can chair meeting in Sydney. Thanks, Arkady -Original Message- From: Lee Yarwood [mailto:lyarw...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 8:29 AM To: openstack-...@lists.openstack.org; openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev]