On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 6:06 AM, Tobias Urdin wrote:
> When I removed those ips and set accept_ra to 0 on the backup router:
>
> ip netns exec qrouter-0775785e-a93a-4501-917b-be92ff03f36a sysctl -w
> net.ipv6.conf.qr-7fad6b1b-c9.accept_ra=0
> ip netns exec
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Joseph Bajin wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> It looks like QOS is already available within the Mitaka release. Maybe it
> doesn't have all the features you need, but looks to be a good start.
>
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Matt Riedemann
wrote:
>
>
> On 2/20/2016 5:29 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2/19/2016 4:48 PM, Kris G. Lindgren wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Kris Lindgren
>>>
I wrote a fairly comprehensive blog series about DVR:
assafmuller.com/category/dvr/
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Adam Lawson wrote:
> Hi everyone:
>
> Got a quick question for those of you with some knowledge of OVS and
> namespaces within the context of DVR.
>
> I'm
ly seen this when the environment has been
> built using terraform. This particular customer re-creates the issue every
> time they rebuild.
I don't know anything about Terraform so I can't help you there. I don't imagine
there's any interesting errors/traces in the neutron-server logs?
>
The HA routers feature we merged in Juno, and those are scheduled to
multiple agents.
If you source admin credentials and 'neutron router-show
951c8ec9-9a6c-4c6d-9d6d-049b3dee7f6f'
is the 'HA' flag set to True? Otherwise, this is a really weird bug
which I've never seen before.
On Tue, Nov 24,
Are you aware of https://github.com/openstack/ospurge?
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Nick Jones
wrote:
> A while ago I knocked up a quick-and-dirty Python script to list various
> ‘orphaned’ Neutron objects. By orphans I mean objects that OpenStack is
> aware
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Daniel Speichert dan...@speichert.pl
wrote:
On 8/22/2015 23:24, Balaji Narayanan (பாலாஜி நாராயணன்) wrote:
Hello Operators,
In the capacity management discussions at the Ops Summit last week, I
thought there was a some discussion on monitoring of fixed /
Also can you paste the configuration for both the OVS agent and your neutron
server? Binding failure is almost always a configuration mismatch.
- Original Message -
Is the neutron openvswitch agent running on host compute2? What do the logs
say for the agent there?
On Jul 22, 2015
Are you running the same version of the code on both nodes?
- Original Message -
On 26-05-2015 11:15, Eren Türkay wrote:
May 26 10:54:15 neutron-ha-2 Keepalived_vrrp[20144]: ip address associated
with
VRID not present in received packet : 169.254.0.1
May 26 10:54:15 neutron-ha-2
- Original Message -
Hi folks,
Looking for a bit of advice on how to accomplish something with Neutron. Our
setup uses OVS+GRE with isolated tenant networks. Currently, we have one
large network servicing our Floating IPs as well as our external router
interfaces.
What we're
for this to be viable, the system
would have to be a
*non binding*, *additional* form of input. The top proposal *could* be declined
for the same reasons
that specs are currently being declined. It would not replace any of our
current systems or processes.
Assaf Muller, Cloud Networking Engineer
Red Hat
as
to why, and if it would be difficult to migrate such a setup to use namespaces.
I'm asking because use_namespaces complicates Neutron code for what I gather
is an option that has not been relevant for years. I'd like to deprecate the
option
for Kilo and remove it in Liberty.
Assaf Muller
the board for other services as well?
Thank you.
Assaf Muller, Cloud Networking Engineer
Red Hat
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
14 matches
Mail list logo