[Openstack-operators] Migration from openvswitch to linuxbridge

2014-09-30 Thread Robert van Leeuwen
ova - instance_info_caches - This looks like it is going to be a problem, the whole network stuff is in here. Although it is called cache it does not seem to be updated if you delete the content :( Anyone tried this before? :) Cheers, Robert van Leeu

Re: [Openstack-operators] Migration from openvswitch to linuxbridge

2014-09-30 Thread Robert van Leeuwen
>> George Shuklin > For high CPU usage for openvswitchd there is a simple solution: upgrade > to anything like 1.11 or higher. There is a huge problem with ovs 1.4, > 1.9, 1.10 - they suck at real-world network activity. All new version > (2.0, 2.1) are much better and works great. Well no, after

Re: [Openstack-operators] Migration from openvswitch to linuxbridge

2014-09-30 Thread Robert van Leeuwen
> To help people help you: > - Are you running with ML2 plugin + ovs mechanism? (yes according to > below details) Currently we run without ML2 but since we run Icehouse we should be able (and have) to migrate to ML2. I am testing in our dev environment with ML2 enabled. > - Do you have flat, vla

Re: [Openstack-operators] Migration from openvswitch to linuxbridge

2014-10-01 Thread Robert van Leeuwen
> > Well no, after updating to 2.1 we actually have increased openvswitch cpu > > consumption on some machines. > What OVS kernel module are you running? How did you update to 2.1? We build our own RPM from upstream. ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list

Re: [Openstack-operators] Problem creating resizable CentOS 6.5 image

2014-10-03 Thread Robert van Leeuwen
size. Cheers, Robert van Leeuwen ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] Issues with hybrid neutron ml2/ovs-agent ports after Icehouse upgrade

2014-10-06 Thread Robert van Leeuwen
or the moment but are planning to move to ML2 in the next month. Not exactly looking forward to that process :-( Cheers, Robert van Leeuwen ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops Meetup to return in Paris - your ideas wanted!

2014-10-07 Thread Robert van Leeuwen
cause there is no useful info in it. Looking at our logstash grok I could probably make some suggestions on what we find useful and not :) Cheers, Robert van Leeuwen ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] Request for feedback on DHCP IP usage

2014-10-07 Thread Robert van Leeuwen
might not get feature parity with different drivers. >So basically my question is - which solution would you prefer as a cloud op? As others before me I also lean toward option one. Cheers, Robert van leeuwen ___ OpenStack-operators mailing li

Re: [Openstack-operators] qemu 1.x to 2.0

2014-10-20 Thread Robert van Leeuwen
x27;s. Maybe people from Ubuntu & Redhat (which I would be interested in ;) reading this could give some suggestions... Cheers, Robert van Leeuwen ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] Ceph Implementations

2014-11-10 Thread Robert van Leeuwen
http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/RHEV/SRPMS/ Build the rpm, install and install librbd1 package You need to link the so file for it to work: ln -s /usr/lib64/librbd.so.1 /usr/lib64/qemu/librbd.so.1 Cheers. Robert van Leeuwen

Re: [Openstack-operators] Ceph Implementations

2014-11-10 Thread Robert van Leeuwen
> +1 for a CentOS 6 deployment, you need to upgrade the qemu, not the kernel. Slightly related: Note that there are currently no Juno RDO packages for CentOS 6. If you are building a new OpenStack deployment I would certainly start with Centos/RHEL 7 Cheers, Robert van Leeu

[Openstack-operators] Bridge and ovs devices not cleaned up after instance deletion. (ml2 related?)

2014-12-17 Thread Robert van Leeuwen
before or have a ready made tool to clean these "orphaned" interfaces? Thx, Robert van Leeuwen ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] Bridge and ovs devices not cleaned up after instance deletion. (ml2 related?)

2014-12-18 Thread Robert van Leeuwen
>>I just noticed that the bridge devices and ovs devices are no longer >>removed after instance deletion. >>So using brctl show and ovs-vsctl show the devices are still there. >The tool exists already as it is called: neutron-ovs-cleanup > You will have the same issues with name spaces but we also

Re: [Openstack-operators] improve perfomance Neutron VXLAN

2015-01-21 Thread Robert van Leeuwen
eed you can do encapsulation in software. You will need network cards that can do VXLAN offloading to go to similar speed as hardware (10Gbit). Cheers, Robert van Leeuwen ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.ope

Re: [Openstack-operators] improve perfomance Neutron VXLAN

2015-01-21 Thread Robert van Leeuwen
> Hi Robert, > >how do I check that? I would take a look at the Spec sheet of the nic. Since it is a pretty recent thing it probably is not supported unless you specifically shopped for a card with support... Cheers, Robert ___ OpenStack-operators mail

Re: [Openstack-operators] Neutron timeout issues

2015-02-19 Thread Robert van Leeuwen
> After our icehouse -> juno upgrade we are noticing sporadic but frequent > errors from nova-metadata when trying to > serve metadata requests. The > error is the following: >Is anyone else noticing this or frequent read timeouts when talking to >neutron? Have you found a solution? > What