Re: [Openstack-operators] [Openstack-sigs] [openstack-dev] Open letter/request to TC candidates (and existing elected officials)

On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 9:14 AM, Fox, Kevin M wrote: > How about stated this way, > Its the tc's responsibility to get it done. Either by delegating the > activity, or by doing it themselves. But either way, it needs to get done. > Its a ball that has been dropped too much in OpenStacks

Re: [Openstack-operators] Upstream LTS Releases

On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 2:51 PM, John Dickinson wrote: > What I heard from ops in the room is that they want (to start) one release a > year who's branch isn't deleted after a year. What if that's exactly what we > did? I propose that OpenStack only do one release a year instead of

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] Upstream LTS Releases

w that the proposition exists about making a Stable Release liaison derived from existing cores, I can't help but get the impression that, for active-but-quiet projects, it'll be yet another PTL responsibility to keep up with, in addition to the rigors that already come with the role