+1. Operator/user community is large enough for such a representation.
Can you elaborate on operators lacking the power?
> On Nov 23, 2015, at 11:39 AM, matt wrote:
>
> Yeah, I'd like to see that as well. Joe Tapajian would be my pick. But I
> don't see that happening. Operators just don't
Very cool. Thanks for the passionate work in realizing this.
> On Oct 24, 2015, at 00:40, Tom Fifield wrote:
>
> Hey ops tags team,
>
> Check out this email from Mark Collier. You can catch the first glimpse of
> end goal for all of our work :)
>
>
> Looking forward to making some great p
Edgar,
> I also wanted to bring to your attention that during the summit the
> attendance was lower that in the mid-cycle one (Philadelphia). Probably
> because there are so many things running in parallel that people just need to
> decide between very important sessions. So, does it make sense
a single
framework where both types of data are accommodated.
Subbu
> On Jun 29, 2015, at 1:51 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>
> Subbu Allamaraju wrote:
>> People will starting calling "tc this" and "uc that" only if we present
>> two sets of data. I t
4 AM, Thierry Carrez
wrote:
> Subbu Allamaraju wrote:
> > Pardon me for being blunt, but I’m still confused why cycles are being
> spent on semantic wrangling. As you rightly point out, the term is
> subjective, and that’s the point.
> >
> > Is there a fear a single set
Pardon me for being blunt, but I’m still confused why cycles are being spent on
semantic wrangling. As you rightly point out, the term is subjective, and
that’s the point.
Is there a fear a single set of tags that include both dev and operational
aspects confuse consumers of OpenStack? Please c
Regarding the discussion on tags, here is my take from the discussion on Monday.
1. There is vehement agreement that having an integrated release consisting of
a small “inner ring” set of service is desirable. There are 6-7 projects that a
majority of operators deploy.
2. There is a general co
+1
> On Feb 3, 2015, at 11:33, Hochmuth, Roland M wrote:
>
> Hi Folks, A number of us involved with the Monasca,
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Monasca, and StackTach,
> https://launchpad.net/stacktach projects, were discussing the possibility of
> having more in-depth discussions aroun
And the video is at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YMLDCBPUnJo
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 10:46 PM, Li, Chengyuan wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Please get slides of our presentation “Seamless Migration from
> Nova-network to Neutron in eBay Production” from below link. Thanks!
>
>
> https://www.openstack.or
It's likely premature for it to have shown up under OpenStack, but that's for a
different thread!
> On Nov 6, 2014, at 16:33, Clint Byrum wrote:
>
> Except in the case of TripleO which is available as an official
> OpenStack project.
___
OpenStack-o
10 matches
Mail list logo
