Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev][tc][all][osprofiler] OSprofiler is dead, long live OSprofiler

Hi stackers, I updated OSprofiler spec: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103825/ reviews are required. Best regards, Boris Pavlovic On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 2:57 AM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: > Hi stackers, > > Intro > --- > > It's not a big secret that OpenStack is huge and complicated ecosy

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev][tc][all][osprofiler] OSprofiler is dead, long live OSprofiler

Joshua, I believe that was one of the original complaints/questions, is that > with osprofiler there is now 2 trace like headers > (https://github.com/openstack/osprofiler/blob/master/osprofiler/web.py#L36 > ) > and such being sent around, should we nail that down now and put that > complaint/ques

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev][tc][all][osprofiler] OSprofiler is dead, long live OSprofiler

+1 from me (although I've already contributed to osprofiler so my vote might not count, ha). Anyway, people can poke me as well if they have any questions about osprofiler and boris isn't around. I'm happy to answer any questions as well... Thanks boris for getting this rolling again... Another q

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [tc][all][osprofiler] OSprofiler is dead, long live OSprofiler

Gord, Something is definitely got there broken (after time that I didn't work on OSprofiler) and we should address that. Best regards, Boris Pavlovic On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 4:44 AM, gord chung wrote: > regarding ceilometer+oslo.messaging backend[1]. i feel like i should > mention, i'm not sur

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [tc][all][osprofiler] OSprofiler is dead, long live OSprofiler

regarding ceilometer+oslo.messaging backend[1]. i feel like i should mention, i'm not sure how you guys are using the query but i should mention that is not the correct way to use Ceilometer meters as it currently isn't measuring anything (see hardcoded - volume:1) again, i'm not sure what que

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev][tc][all][osprofiler] OSprofiler is dead, long live OSprofiler

On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 02:57:37AM -0800, Boris Pavlovic wrote: > Hi stackers, > > Intro > --- > > It's not a big secret that OpenStack is huge and complicated ecosystem of > different > services that are working together to implement OpenStack API. > > For example booting VM is going throug

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev][tc][all][osprofiler] OSprofiler is dead, long live OSprofiler

(Sorry Boris, now with correct CC list.) Boris Pavlovic wrote: Hi stackers, Intro --- It's not a big secret that OpenStack is huge and complicated ecosystem of different services that are working together to implement OpenStack API. For example booting VM is going through many projec

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [tc][all][osprofiler] OSprofiler is dead, long live OSprofiler

Boris, I believe finishing work related to OSprofiler development is crucial for the teams like Performance Team kicked off during the Tokyo summit. I'll raise question is people are interested in taking part in its development tomorrow on IRC meeting

[Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev][tc][all][osprofiler] OSprofiler is dead, long live OSprofiler

Hi stackers, Intro --- It's not a big secret that OpenStack is huge and complicated ecosystem of different services that are working together to implement OpenStack API. For example booting VM is going through many projects and services: nova-api, nova-scheduler, nova-compute, glance-api, gl