Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [Openstack] Rescinding the M name decision

2015-07-14 Thread Lauren Sell
Good news. After finalizing the trademark checks and giving the community time to weigh in, Mitaka will be the name of the M release. Thanks again for the great discussion around this topic, and for the willingness to be responsive to the concerns of fellow community members. > On Jul 9, 2015

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [Openstack] Rescinding the M name decision

2015-07-13 Thread Brad Knowles
On Jul 10, 2015, at 4:19 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > I think "growing up" is accepting the pain that comes with picking a > good name, rather than sidestepping the issue. I’ve heard the phrase that there are only two hard problems in computer science, and naming is one of them. Just because it

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [Openstack] Rescinding the M name decision

2015-07-11 Thread Jaesuk Ahn
+1 from me as well. 2015년 7월 10일 (금) 18:27, Neil Jerram 님이 작성: > On 10/07/15 10:19, Thierry Carrez wrote: > > > > Part of the confusion here is that we are not naming "releases". We are > > naming release *cycles*. We are giving a name to a period of time, > > basically. In that period of time, v

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [Openstack] Rescinding the M name decision

2015-07-10 Thread Neil Jerram
On 10/07/15 10:19, Thierry Carrez wrote: Part of the confusion here is that we are not naming "releases". We are naming release *cycles*. We are giving a name to a period of time, basically. In that period of time, various version numbers for various components will be released. Saying "Glance 1

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [Openstack] Rescinding the M name decision

2015-07-10 Thread Thierry Carrez
Adam Lawson wrote: > The alternative of course is to just number the releases since names > ultimately don't mean anything but it seems there are problems with that > level of simplicity. I personally prefer Tristan's suggestion to keep it > as simple as possible. In a few years we'll run out of le

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [Openstack] Rescinding the M name decision

2015-07-09 Thread Adam Lawson
It seems we have a golden opportunity here to improve efficiency by vetting names before we vote on them. Seems that voting for a bunch of names then eliminating all of the top votes because they won't work doesn't strike me as very efficient (i.e. why vote on names that MIGHT be valid). The alter

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [Openstack] Rescinding the M name decision

2015-07-09 Thread Tim Bell
Feel free to give input on the Mitaka proposal. Tim > -Original Message- > From: Jonathan Bryce [mailto:jbr...@jbryce.com] > Sent: 09 July 2015 20:52 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] Rescinding the M name decisio