Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [cinder] [all] The future of Cinder API v1

2015-09-30 Thread Matt Fischer
Thanks for summarizing this Mark. What's the best way to get feedback about this to the TC? I'd love to see some of the items which I think are common sense for anyone who can't just blow away devstack and start over to get added for consideration. On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Mark Voelker

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [cinder] [all] The future of Cinder API v1

2015-09-29 Thread Matt Fischer
> > > > I agree with John Griffith. I don't have any empirical evidences to back > my "feelings" on that one but it's true that we weren't enable to enable > Cinder v2 until now. > > Which makes me wonder: When can we actually deprecate an API version? I > *feel* we are fast to jump on the

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [cinder] [all] The future of Cinder API v1

2015-09-29 Thread Mathieu Gagné
On 2015-09-28 11:43 PM, John Griffith wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Mark Voelker > wrote: > > FWIW, the most popular client libraries in the last user survey[1] > other than OpenStack’s own clients were: libcloud (48

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [cinder] [all] The future of Cinder API v1

2015-09-29 Thread Mark Voelker
Mark T. Voelker > On Sep 29, 2015, at 12:36 PM, Matt Fischer wrote: > > > > I agree with John Griffith. I don't have any empirical evidences to back > my "feelings" on that one but it's true that we weren't enable to enable > Cinder v2 until now. > > Which makes me

[Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [cinder] [all] The future of Cinder API v1

2015-09-28 Thread Ivan Kolodyazhny
Hi all, As you may know, we've got 2 APIs in Cinder: v1 and v2. Cinder v2 API was introduced in Grizzly and v1 API is deprecated since Juno. After [1] is merged, Cinder API v1 is disabled in gates by default. We've got a filed bug [2] to remove Cinder v1 API at all. According to Deprecation

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [cinder] [all] The future of Cinder API v1

2015-09-28 Thread Sam Morrison
Yeah we’re still using v1 as the clients that are packaged with most distros don’t support v2 easily. Eg. with Ubuntu Trusty they have version 1.1.1, I just updated our “volume” endpoint to point to v2 (we have a volumev2 endpoint too) and the client breaks. $ cinder list ERROR: OpenStack

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [cinder] [all] The future of Cinder API v1

2015-09-28 Thread Mark Voelker
FWIW, the most popular client libraries in the last user survey[1] other than OpenStack’s own clients were: libcloud (48 respondents), jClouds (36 respondents), Fog (34 respondents), php-opencloud (21 respondents), DeltaCloud (which has been retired by Apache and hasn’t seen a commit in two